期刊文献+

支架内新生动脉粥样硬化与不同免疫反应及免疫细胞关系的研究进展 被引量:2

Research progress of relationship among different immune responses,immune cells and in-stent neo-atherosclerosis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 支架置入术后,支架内再狭窄(ISR)及晚期血栓形成仍为影响PCI术疗效的重要因素。近年来大量证据表明:支架内新生动脉粥样硬化(ISNA)发生发展过程与原发性动脉粥样硬化大致相同,都具有慢性炎症的特征。免疫炎症类型及相关分子机制是ISNA斑块中的免疫炎症基础。本文就ISNA与不同免疫类型及免疫细胞的关系作一综述,旨在为了解ISNA的发生发展过程提供新思路。 After stent implantation,in-stent restenosis(ISR)and late thrombosis are still important factors affecting therapeutic effect of PCI.In recent years,a large amount of evidence suggest that occurrence and development process of in-stent neo-atherosclerosis(ISNA)is roughly the same as that of primary atherosclerosis,and both have the characteristics of chronic inflammation.Types of immune inflammation and related molecular mechanisms are the basis of immune inflammation in ISNA plaques.The present article made a review on the relationship among different immune types,immune cells and ISNA,aiming at providing new thinking for understanding the occurrence and development of ISNA.
作者 王文成 侯静波 WANG Wen-cheng;HOU Jing-bo(Department of Cardiology,Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University,Harbin,Heilongjiang,150081,China)
出处 《心血管康复医学杂志》 CAS 2021年第2期247-249,共3页 Chinese Journal of Cardiovascular Rehabilitation Medicine
关键词 血管成形术 气囊 冠状动脉 支架 动脉粥样硬化 Angioplasty,balloon,coronary Stents Atherosclerosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献49

  • 1Kirtane A J, Gupta A, Iyengar S, et al. Safety and efficacy of drug - eluting and bare metal stents: comprehensive meta -analysis of randomized trials and observational studies[J ]. Circulation, 2009, 119: 3198.
  • 2von Birgelen C, Sen H, Lam M K, et al. Third - generation zotarolimus- during and everolimus - eluting stents in all - comer patients requiring a percutaneous coronary intervention (DUTCH PEERS) : a randomised, single - blind, muhieen- tre, non-inferiority trial[J]. Lancet, 2014, 383: 413.
  • 3Youn Y J, Ahn S G, Lee J H, et al. Safety and efficacy of everolimus - eluting stents versus zotarolimus - eluting stents for 3 - year of follow- up in real- world practice[J]. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2013, 62: 1358.
  • 4von Birgelen C, Basalus M W, Tandjung K, et al. A ran- domized controlled trial in second - generation zotarolimus- eluting Resolute stents versus everolimus - eluting Xience V stents in real world patients: the TWENTE trial[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2012, 59: 1350.
  • 5Taniwaki M, Stefanini G G, Silber S, et ah Four Year Clin- ical Outcomes and Predictors of Repeat Revascularization in Patients Treated With New Generation Drug- Eluting Stents in the RESOLUTE All Comers Randomized Trial [J ]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2014.
  • 6Serruys P W, Silber S, Garg S, et al. Comparison of zo- tarolimus eluting and everolimus eluting coronary stents [J ]. The New England journal of medicine, 2010, 363: 136.
  • 7Velders M A, Boden H, van der Hoeven B L, et al. Long- term outcome of second - generation everolimus - eluting stents and Endeavor zotarolimus- eluting stents in a prospec- tive registry o[ ST - elevation myocardial, infarction patients [J]. EuroIntervention, 2013, 8: 1199.
  • 8Peters J L, Sutton A J, Jones D R, et al. Contour- en- hanced meta - analysis funnel plots help distinguish publica- tion bias from other causes of asyrnmetry[J ]. Journal of clini- cal epidemiology, 2008, 61: 991.
  • 9Egger M, Smith G D, Schneider M, et al. Bias in meta- analysis detected by a simple, graphical test[J]. BMJ (Clini- cal research ed), 1997, 315:629.
  • 10Mehilli J, Richardt G, Valgimigli M, et al. Zotarolimus- versus everolimus - eluting stents for unprotected left main coronary artery disease [ J ]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2013, 62 : 2075.

共引文献13

同被引文献39

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部