期刊文献+

CyberKnife系统中肝癌计划实施剂量计算及验证的评价研究 被引量:1

Evaluation of Dose Calculation and Verfication Plan of Liver Cancer in CyberKnife
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的采用Monte Carlo与Ray-Tracing算法实施剂量计算及验证,分析和评估肝癌典型病例CyberKnife计划的准确性、可靠性,为不同算法在临床应用中的选择提供参考。方法选择在我科行CK治疗的肝癌肿瘤患者33例,分别使用射线追踪(Ray-Tracing,RT)算法和蒙特卡罗(Monte Carlo,MC)算法进行计划剂量计算并评估;另从中选取10例用固体水模对计划进行剂量验证。结果左叶肝癌靶区RT算法的平均剂量值为58.21 Gy,MC算法的平均值为57.76,两者相差0.45 Gy(0.78%);右叶肝癌RT算法的平均值为55.82 Gy,MC算法的平均值为54.60 Gy,两者相差1.22 Gy(2.23%);采用MC算法重新精算后,食管、胃、脊髓、肠道、十二指肠及肝脏的平均剂量均有所降低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);以MC算法剂量计算作为基准,肝癌患者中RT算法高估1.09%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);采用均匀固体水进行验证,RT和MC两种算法点剂量计算值与测量值差异均在±3%以内,采用3%/2 mm标准分析γ通过率均大于93%。结论本研究通过对RT和MC两种算法在肝癌肿瘤实施计划剂量计算及其验证开展了系统研究与测试,对其准确性及偏差进行了考证,可为CK系统中肝癌计划算法的选择和治疗实施提供依据,对临床具有一定的指导意义。 Objective In this study,different algorithms were used for dose calculation and verification of SRT plans in typical cases of liver cancer.The accuracy and reliability of SRT plans under different conditions were analyzed and evaluated,so as to provide certain reference for the selection of different algorithms in clinical application.Methods In this study,33 liver cancer patients treated with CK in our department were chosen.The dose calculation and verification were done to evaluate using Ray-Tracing(RT)and Monte Carlo(MC)algorithms respectively.In addition,10 typical cases were selected to do the dose verificaiton with solid water.The differences between the two algorithms and its selection of application were analyzed and discussed.Results The average dose value of RT algorithm in the target area of left lobe liver cancer was 58.21 Gy,and the average value of MC algorithm was 57.76.The difference between two algorithms was 0.45 Gy(0.78%).The mean value of RT algorithm in right lobe liver cancer was 55.82 Gy,and the average value of MC algorithm was 54.60 Gy,with a difference of 1.22 Gy(2.23%).After re-calculation using MC algorithm,the average dose of esophagus,stomach,spinal cord,intestinal tract,duodenum and liver were all decreased,with statistical significance(P<0.05).Taking the dose calculation of MC algorithm as the baseline,RT algorithm was overestimated by 1.09% in patients with liver cancer,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Uniform solid water was used for verification,the difference between the calculated value of point dose and the measured value of RT and MC was within ±3%,and the passing rate of γ analysis using 3%/2 mm standard was greater than 93%.Conclusion In this study,the systematic research and measurement were carried out on dose calculation and verification of the RT and MC algorithms in liver tumor sites,and their accuracy and deviation were verified,thus providing the basis for the selection and treatment implementation of SRT plans in liver sites of CK system,which has a certain guiding significance for clinical practice.
作者 葛瑞刚 解传滨 戴相昆 杨涛 王越 王树鑫 曲宝林 徐寿平 GE Ruigang;XIE Chuanbin;DAI Xiangkun;YANG Tao;WANG Yue;WANG Shuxin;QU Baolin;XU Shouping(Department of Radiotherapy,The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital,Beijing 100853,China)
出处 《中国医疗设备》 2021年第4期132-136,共5页 China Medical Devices
基金 国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(81801799)。
关键词 立体定向放射治疗 射线追踪算法 蒙特卡罗算法 剂量计算 剂量验证 stereotactic radiation therapy Ray-Tracing algorithm Monte Carlo algorithm dose calculation dose verification
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献45

  • 1戴建荣,胡逸民,张红志,关莹,张可,王闯.针对患者调强放射治疗计划的剂量学验证[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2004,13(3):229-233. 被引量:65
  • 2梁世雄,蒋国梁,朱小东,傅小龙,黎福祥,黄启芳,王安宇,陈龙,陆海杰.原发性肝癌大分割三维适形放疗的预后因素分析[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2005,27(10):613-615. 被引量:13
  • 3陈光耀.临床肿瘤医师如何善用放射外科的新利器[J].中国肿瘤临床,2007,34(1):1-5. 被引量:16
  • 4Timmerman RD,Herman J,Cho LC.Emergence of stereotactic body radiation therapy and its impact on current and future clinical practice. Journal of Clinical Oncology . 2014
  • 5Sun HB,Mi SK,Won J,et al.Low hepatic toxicity in primary and metastatic liver cancers after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy using 3 fractions. Journal of Korean Medical Science . 2015
  • 6èCoste‐Manière,DOlender,WKilby,R ASchulz.??Robotic whole body stereotactic radiosurgery: clinical advantages of the Cyberknife<sup>?</sup> integrated system(J)Int. J. Med. Robotics Comput. Assist. Surg. . 2006 (2)
  • 7Jason Chia-Hsien Cheng,Jian-Kuen Wu,Chao-Ming Huang,Hua-Shan Liu,David Y. Huang,Skye Hongiun Cheng,Stella Y. Tsai,James Jer-Min Jian,Yu-Mong Lin,Tsun-I Cheng,Cheng-Fang Horng,Andrew T. Huang.??Radiation-induced liver disease after three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: dosimetric analysis and implication(J)International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics . 2002 (1)
  • 8Lawrence TS,Ten-Haken RK,Kessler ML,et al.The use of 3-D dose volume analysis to predict radiation hepatitis. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics . 1992
  • 9Ding C,Solberg TD,Hrycushko B,Xing L,Heinzerling J,Timmerman RD.Optimization of normalized prescription isodose selection for stereotactic body radiation therapy:conventional vs robotic linac. Medical Physics . 2013
  • 10Chang ZH,Wang Y,Wu HP.Comprehensive treatment and liver cancer and tumor antiangiogenesis therapy. World Chin J Gastroenterol . 2012

共引文献19

同被引文献7

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部