摘要
目的:比较三种材料修复无髓年轻第一恒磨牙的临床效果。方法:275颗无髓并大面积牙体组织缺损的年轻第一恒磨牙分为3组,1组(93颗)采用树脂充填;2组(90颗)采用E-max高嵌体修复;3组(92颗)采用VITA enamic高嵌体修复;在修复后按照改良USPHS标准评价各组修复效果。结果:6个月随访:3组修复体修复效果差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。1年随访:2、3组在修复体完整性、边缘密合性方面成功率高于1组(P<0.05);2年随访:2、3组在修复体完整性、边缘密合性方面成功率高于1组,2组修复体对颌牙磨损较1、3组重(P<0.05),修复体颜色匹配方面2组(100%)优于1组、3组(P<0.05)。结论:嵌体修复年轻恒牙牙体大面积缺损临床效果显著优于树脂充填,E-max铸瓷嵌体颜色匹配优于VITA enamic和树脂,VITA enamic嵌体在对对颌牙的保护优于E-max嵌体。
Objective:To compare the clinical effects of 3 kinds materials in the treatment of pulpless young first permanent molars.Methods:275 young pulpless first molars with large area of tooth tissue defect were randomly divided into 3 groups and repaired with resin(group 1),E-max onlay(group 2)and VITA enamic onlay(group 3)respectively.The effect of each group was evaluated by modified USPHS after treatment.Results:At 6 months follow-up there was no significant difference of the effect among the 3 groups(P>0.05).At 1 year follow-up the success rate of group 2 and group 3 in the integrity of the prosthesis and edge sealing was higher than that of group 1(P<0.05).At 2 years follow-up the success rate of group 2 and group 3 in the integrity of the prosthesis and edge sealing was higher than that of the group 1,the abrasion of oppisite teeth in group 2 was heavier than that of the group 1 and 3(P<0.05),the color matching of group 2(100%)was superior to that of group 1 and 3(P<0.05).Conclusion:Onlay is more effective in r epairing large area defect of young permanent teeth than resin.The E-max onlay is more color matching than VITA enamic onlay and resin filling.VITA enamic onlay is more protective for antagonist teeth.
作者
史恒瑞
SHI Hengrui(Department of Stomatology,Dingqiao Hospital,Zhejiang Province,Hangzhou,310022 China)
出处
《实用口腔医学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2021年第2期216-219,共4页
Journal of Practical Stomatology