期刊文献+

某工程岩质边坡支护方案数值模拟分析 被引量:2

Numerical Simulation Analysis of the Support Scheme for a Rock Slope Engineering
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以某工程岩质边坡为研究对象,基于Midas/GTS有限元软件研究了重力式挡墙法、全长粘结型锚杆支护法以及预应力锚杆法三种方案下的边坡稳定性。结果表明:初始状态边坡存在潜在的圆弧状的表层滑动带,最大塑性应变值为4.97×10~(-2),位于强风化石灰岩夹板岩与中风化石灰岩夹板岩交界处;最大水平位移值为42.02mm,初始稳定性系数为1.08。三种支护方案下边坡最大塑性应变值分别减小至6.70×10~(-3)、1.07×10~(-3)、2.73×10~(-4),最大水平位移分别减小至25.40mm、10.72mm、2.56mm,稳定性系数分别增至1.16、1.36、1.58。模拟结果表明预应力锚杆支护方案对边坡整体稳定性的提升最为明显,预应力锚杆支护为最优方案。 Taking the rock slope of a project as the research object,based on the Midas/GTS finite element software,the stability of the slope under the three schemes of the gravity retaining wall method,the full-length bonded anchor support method and the prestressed anchor method.The results show that there is a potential arc-shaped surface sliding zone at the initial state slope,the maximum plastic strain value is 4.97×10-2,which is located at the junction of strongly weathered limestone interbedded slate and mid-weathered limestone interbedded slate;the maximum horizontal displacement value is 42.02 mm,the initial stability factor is 1.08.Under the three support schemes,the maximum plastic strain values of the slope were reduced to 6.70×10-3、1.07×10-3、2.73×10-4,and the maximum horizontal displacements were reduced to 25.40mm,10.72mm,and 2.56mm,respectively,and the stability coefficients were Increased to 1.16,1.36,1.58.The simulation results show that prestressed anchor supporting scheme has the most obvious improvement on the slope overall stability,and the prestressed anchor supporting is the optimal scheme.
作者 杨湧涛 Yang Yongtao(Shanxi Communications Expressway Co.,Ltd.,Taiyuan 030006,China)
出处 《北方交通》 2021年第4期40-43,48,共5页 Northern Communications
关键词 岩质边坡 支护方案对比 重力式挡墙法 全长粘结型锚杆 预应力锚杆 Rock slope Comparison of supporting schemes Gravity retaining wall method Full-length bonded anchors Prestressed anchors
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献36

共引文献78

同被引文献13

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部