期刊文献+

全耳内镜下中耳乳突部胆脂瘤手术的短期效果观察 被引量:7

Short Term Outcomes of Transcanal Endoscopic Ear Surgery for Mastoid Cholesteatoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨经外耳道全耳内镜下处理中耳乳突部胆脂瘤的可行性和有效性。方法回顾性分析2019年9月至2020年5月收治的32例累及乳突的胆脂瘤患者经外耳道全耳内镜下的手术临床资料。结果32例患者气导平均听阈术前为56.52±4.89dB HL,术后6月为38.49±3.82)dBHL,差异有统计学意义(t=22.59,P=0.00);平均气骨导距术前为31.45±4.52dBHL,术后6月为17.36±5.14 dBHL,差异有统计学意义(t=15.35,P=0.00)。所有患者鼓膜愈合良好,人工听骨无外露脱出,无面瘫、无眩晕,无听力进一步下降。结论经外耳道入路全耳内镜下乳突部手术术后患者听力较前提高,是安全有效的手术方式。 Objective To report outcomes of transcanal endoscopic ear surgery for mastoid cholesteatoma.Methods Data from 32 patients who underwent transcanal endoscopic ear surgery for mastoid cholesteatoma from September 2019 to May 2020 were retrospectively analyzed.Results Mean preoperative air conduction threshold was 56.52±4.89 dB HL,compared to 38.49±3.82 dB HL 6 months after surgery(t=22.59,P=0.00).Similarly,mean air-bone gap was reduced from 31.45±4.52 dB preoperatively to 17.36±5.14 dB postoperatively(t=15.35,P=0.00).There was no facial paralysis,dizziness or additional hearing loss after surgery in all patients,but well healed tympanic membrane and no artificial ossicle prolapse.Conclusion Endoscopic ear surgery through the external auditory canal on for mastoid cholesteatoma can improve hearing.It is a safe and effective surgical tool.
作者 陈抗松 邹团明 王博琛 孙恺 陈俊明 叶海雯 毛伟龙 虞幼军 CHEN Kangsong;ZOU Tuanming;WANG Bochen;SUN Kai;CHEN Junming;YE Haiwen;MAO Weilong;YU Youjun(Department of Otology,First People’s Hospital of Foshan,Foshan,528000,China)
出处 《中华耳科学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2021年第2期209-212,共4页 Chinese Journal of Otology
关键词 耳内镜手术 中耳胆脂瘤 乳突 Endoscopic ear surgery Middle ear cholesteatoma Mastoid
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献30

  • 1高下,戴艳红,钱晓云,张倩,陈杰,陈峰.耳内镜在耳科临床的应用[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志,2005,13(5):369-370. 被引量:15
  • 2杨仕明,韩东一,方耀云,杨伟炎.耳内镜临床应用与展望[J].继续医学教育,2006,20(20):33-35. 被引量:9
  • 3姜学钧.慢性化脓性中耳炎与鼓室成形术.//韩德民.耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学.北京:中华医学电子音像出版社,2006:93-98.
  • 4Kuo CL, Liao WH, Shiao AS. A review of current progress in acquired cholesteatoma management [ J ]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2015, 272 (12) : 3601-3609. DOI: 10. 1007/ s00405 -014 -3291-0.
  • 5Quaranta N, Iannuzzi L, Petrone P, et al. Quality of life after cholesteatoma surgery: intact-canal wall tympanoplasty versus canal wall-down tympanoplasty with mastoid obliteration[ J]. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 2014, 123 (2) :89-93. DOI: 10. 1177/ 0003489414523562.
  • 6Black B, Gutteridge I. Acquired cholesteatoma: classification and outcomes[J]. Otol Neurotol, 2011, 32(6) :992-995. DOI: 10. 1097/MAO. 0b013 e3182255874.
  • 7Shinnabe A, Yamamoto H, Hara M, et al. Differences in clinical characteristics of fallopian canal dehiscence associated with pars flaccida and pars tensa cholesteatomas [ J ]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2014, 271 (8):2171-2175. DOI: 10. 1007/ s00405-013-2713-8.
  • 8Okada M, Gyo K, Takagi T, et al. Air-bone gap in ears with a well-repaired tympanic membrane after Type III and Type IV tympanoplasty[ J]. Auris Nasus Larynx, 2014, 41 (2) : 153-159. DOI: 10. 1016/j. anl. 2013.10. 006.
  • 9Neudert M, Lailach S, Lasurashvili N, et al. Cholesteatoma recidivism : comparison of three different surgical techniques [ J ]. Otol Neurotol, 2014, 35 (10) : 1801-1808. DOI : 10. 1097/MAO. 0000000000000484.
  • 10Deniz M, Uslu C, Kolda C, et al. Which technique is better for cholesteatoma surgery[J]. B-ENT, 2015, 11(2):109-115.

共引文献78

同被引文献84

引证文献7

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部