期刊文献+

药物超敏反应综合征14例漏误诊原因分析 被引量:2

Missed Diagnosis and Misdiagnosis Analysis of 14 Cases of Drug-induced Hypersensitivity Syndrome
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨药物超敏反应综合征(DIHS)的临床特点以及漏误诊原因。方法回顾性分析2014年1月—2018年10月住院诊断为重症药疹的患者,按照RegiSCAR评分系统筛选出DIHS的病例,将其他重症药疹患者纳入非DIHS组。记录2组的致敏药物、一般资料、临床症状、实验室检查等,并对相关数据进行统计分析。结果本次研究重症药疹37例,经RegiSCAR评分系统筛选DIHS 14例(漏误诊率37.84%)。DIHS患者中常见的致敏药物为抗生素类,其次为非甾体抗炎药。DIHS患者以发热(主要为高热)、嗜酸粒细胞升高、淋巴结肿大及肝功能损伤多见,可出现面部肿胀、异型淋巴细胞,且在糖皮质激素减量过程中易复发。DIHS组与非DIHS组白细胞异常、嗜酸粒细胞升高、天冬氨酸转氨酶>100 U/L患者比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05,P<0.01)。14例DIHS经治疗后,7例好转出院,1例痊愈出院,1例自动出院失访,2例转上级医院,3例死亡;治疗有效率57.14%,病死率21.43%。3例死亡患者病情进展极为迅速,均出现内脏器官损伤,2例为多器官功能衰竭。结论重症药疹患者应进行RegiSCAR评分系统评分,提高该病的早期诊断率。DIHS病情进展快,病死率高,应加强对本病的认识,尽量避免漏诊及误诊,及时停用致敏药物,把握治疗时机,降低该病病死率。 Objective To investigate the clinical characteristics and causes of missed diagnosis and misdiagnosis of drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome(DIHS).Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data of patients who had admitted for severe drug eruption during January 2014 and October 2018.According to the RegiSCAR scoring system,the patients with DIHS were selected,and other patients with severe drug eruption were included in the non-DIHS group.The sensitizing drugs,general information,clinical symptoms and laboratory tests of the two groups were recorded,and the relevant data were statistically analyzed.Results A total of 37 cases of severe drug eruption were included in this study,and 14 DIHS cases were included based on the RegiSCAR scoring system(37.84%missed/misdiagnosis rate).The most common sensitizing drugs in DIHS patients were antibiotics,followed by NSAIDs.In patients with DIHS,fever(mainly high fever),increased eosinophils,enlarged lymph nodes and liver function damage were more common.Facial swelling,atypical lymphocytes,and recurrence in the process of glucocorticoid reduction were common in patients with DIHS.There were statistically significant differences between DIHS group and non-DIHS group in abnormal white blood cells,increased eosinophils,and aspartate aminotransferase more than 100 U/L(P<0.05,P<0.01).After treatment for the 14 DIHS cases,7 cases were improved and discharged;1 case recovered and discharged;1 case was discharged voluntarily and lost to follow-up;2 cases were transferred to higher-level hospitals,and 3 cases died.The effective rate of treatment was 57.14%,and the mortality rate was 21.43%.The conditions of the 3 dead patients progressed extremely rapidly,all of them had internal organ damage,and 2 patients had multiple organ failure.Conclusion The patients with severe drug eruption should be scored with RegiSCAR scoring system to improve the early diagnosis rate of the disease.DIHS condition progresses rapidly and has a high fatality rate.Therefore,we should strengthen understanding of the disease,avoid missed diagnosis and misdiagnosis,stop sensitizing drugs in time and grasp the timing of treatment to reduce the fatality rate of patients.
作者 邓玲俐 刘林莉 杨清媛 刘嘉玲 于春水 DENG Ling-li;LIU Lin-li;YANG Qing-yuan;LIU Jia-ling;YU Chun-shui(Graduate School of Zunyi Medical University,Zunyi,Guizhou 563003,China;Department of Dermatology,Suining Central Hospital,Suining,Sichuan 629000,China)
出处 《临床误诊误治》 CAS 2021年第4期10-15,共6页 Clinical Misdiagnosis & Mistherapy
关键词 超敏反应 药物 误诊 药疹 抗生素类 消炎药 非甾类 多器官功能衰竭 Hypersensitivity,drug Misdiagnosis Drug eruptions Antibiotics Anti-inflammatory agents,non-steroidal Multiple organ failure
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献44

  • 1Takahashi R, Kano Y, Yamazaki Y, et al. Defective regulatory T cells in patients with severe drug eruptions: timing of the dysfunction is associated with the pathological phenotype and outcome. J Immunol,2009, 182( 12): 8071-8079.
  • 2Grimes PE, Halder RM, Jones C, et al. Autoantibodies and their clinical significance in a black vitiligo population. Arch Dermatol, 1983, 119(4): 300-303.
  • 3Shiohara T, Iijima M, Ikezawa Z, et al. The diagnosis of a DRESS syndrome has been sufficiently established on the basis of typical clinical features and viral reactivations. Br J Dermatol, 2007, 156(5): 1083-1084.
  • 4Bocquet H, Bagot M, Roujeau JC. Drug-induced pseudoly- mphoma and drug hypersensitivity syndrome (Drug Rash with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms: DRESS). Semin Cutan Med Surg, 1996, 15(4): 250-257.
  • 5Seishima M, Yamanaka S, Fujisawa T, et al. Reactivation of human herpesvirus (HHV) family members other than HHV-6 in drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome. Br J Dermatol, 2006, 155 (2): 344-349.
  • 6Hashizume H, Takigawa M. Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome associated with cytomegalovirus reactivation: immunological characterization of pathogenic T cells. Acta Derm Venereol, 2005, 85( 1 ): 47-50.
  • 7Mansur AT. Pekcan Yasxar S, Gktay F. An- ticonvulsant hypersensitivity syndrome: clin- ical and laboratory features[ J]. Int J Derma- tol,2008,47( 11 ) :1184 - 1189.
  • 8BocquetH, Bagot M, Roujeau JC. Drug-in- duced pseudolymphoma and drug hypersen- sitivity syndrome ( drug rash with eosinophil- ia and systemic symptoms : DRESS ) [ J ]. Semin C utan Med Surg, 1996,15 (4) :250 - 257.
  • 9Um SJ, Lee SK, Kim YH, et al. Clinical features of drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome in 38 patients [ J ]. J Investig Aller- gol Clin Immunol,2010,20 (7) :556 - 562.
  • 10Pinana E, Lei SH, Merino R, et al. DRESS-syndrome on sulfetsalazine and naproxen treatment for juvenile idiopathic ar- thritis and reactivation of human herpevims 5 in an 11-year-old Caucasian boy [J ]. J Clin Pharm Ther, 2010, 35(3) :365 -370.

共引文献34

同被引文献10

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部