期刊文献+

对比数字乳腺断层合成摄影与全数字化乳腺摄影对致密型乳腺内非钙化肿块的诊断价值 被引量:3

Diagnostic Value of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Photography vs.Full Digital Mammography for Dense Non-calcified Breast Masses
下载PDF
导出
摘要 影像学检查是乳腺癌早期筛查及诊断的主要手段之一。尽管全数字化乳腺摄影(full field digital mammography,FFDM)的空间分辨力和对比度较普通乳腺X线摄影(digital mammography,DM)有大幅的提升,然而FFDM检查因避免不了非钙化型肿块在致密型乳腺中与周围较多的腺体组织重叠的影响,故对非钙化型肿块检测的敏感性较低。文献报道,FFDM有将近17%的非钙化型乳腺癌未被检出,同时有将近70%~90%的疑似恶性病灶最终被确诊为“假阳性”^([1])。
出处 《浙江中西医结合杂志》 2021年第4期355-358,共4页 Zhejiang Journal of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine
基金 浙江省湖州市科技局公益性一般项目(No.2018GY21)。
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献37

  • 1杨玲,李连弟,陈育德,D.M.Parkin.中国乳腺癌发病死亡趋势的估计与预测[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2006,28(6):438-440. 被引量:278
  • 2Skaane P, Young K, Skjennald A, et al. Population-based mam- mography screening : comparison of screen-film and full-filed digital mammography with soft-copy Oslo 1 study [ J ]. Radiology, 2003, 229 ( 3 ) :877-833.
  • 3Gong X, Glick SJ, Liu B, et al. A computer simulation study com- paring lesion detection accuracy with digital mammography , breast tomosynthesis,and cone-beam CT breast imagingl J]. Medical Phys- ics, 2006, 33(4) :1041-1052.
  • 4Park A M, Franken EA, Garg M, et al. Breast tomosynthesis: Pres- ent considerations and Future applications [ J ]. Riadiographics, 2007 (27) :231-240.
  • 5Good WF, Abrams GS, Catullo VJ, et al. Digital breast Tomosyn- thesis :A Pilot Observer Study[J]. AJR,2008(190) :865-869.
  • 6Rafferty E, Niklason L, Halpern E,et al. Assessing radiologist per- fonnance using combined full-filed digital mammogTaphy and breast tomosynthesis versus full-filed digital mammography alone: results of a multi-center multi-reader trial[ J]. Radiological Society of North American annualmeeting,2007,45(5) :831-843.
  • 7Baker JA, LO JY. Breast Tomosynthesis : state-of-the-art and re- view of the literature [ J ]. Academic Radiology, 2011,18 ( 10 ) : 1298-1301.
  • 8Rafferty EA, Niklason L. FFDM versus FFDM with tomosynthesisfor women with radiographically dense breasts : an enriched retro- spective reader study [ J ]. Radiolographieally Society of North Amer- ica annual meeting . LNCS 5116:61-66.
  • 9Gur D, Bandos AI, Rockette HE, et al. Is an ROC-type response truly always better than a binary response in observer performance studies[ J]. Acad Radiol,2010, 17 (5) :639-654. .
  • 10Fischmann A, Siegmann KC, Wersebe A, et al. Comparison of full- filed digital mmmnography and full-screen mammography: image quality and lesion detection[J]. Radiology, 2005, 78(928) :312-317.

共引文献101

同被引文献31

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部