期刊文献+

美国高校年度报告中文化-认知调查——基于正当性的制度视角分析

Culture-Cognition Survey in the Annual Reporting of American Universities——Analysis Based on Institutional Legitimacy Perspective
原文传递
导出
摘要 文化-认知调查是美国高校年度报告中关注不同社会群体感受,尤其是学生群体感受的制度形式。消费者理念、依法行事、投入-回报等共同信念构成了文化-认知调查外源性和内源性的动力,驱动了多样化调查类型的产生,使其呈现出多级多类的格局结构。正当性的制度视角分析发现,目的动因、调查形式、参与主体、技术手段等均是文化-认知调查的正当性表现方式。客观理性层面上,文化-认知调查具有竞争与互补双重功能、生成了信息竞争机制、具有专业性特色;主观认同层面上,文化-认知调查得到公众的积极参与和信任、具备公众认同的鲜明类型。文化-认知调查提升了美国高等教育质量,但未来仍应增强改革的正当性。 Cultural-cognitive survey is an institutional form of the annual reporting of American universities that focuses on the feelings of different social groups,especially the feelings of students.Common beliefs including consumer concept,law-based behavior,and investment-return constitute the exogenous power and endogenous power of culture-cognitive survey,which drives the generation of diversified investigation types.Culture-cognitive survey is a multiple hierarchical and multiple category structure.In the further deconstruction,institutional perspective of legitimacy analysis shows that cultural-cognitive investigation has many legitimate ways of expression,which are the subject of participation,the source of purpose,the form of investigation and the technical means.The legitimacy of culture-cognition investigation is manifested in two aspects.On the objective level,culture-cognition survey has the function of competition and complementation,generates the information competition mechanism,and has the characteristics of strong specialization.On the subjective level,cultural-cognitive surveys are actively engaged and trusted by the public,and the types of survey are recognized by the public.Culture-cognition survey has led to the development of the quality of higher education in the United States,but the legitimacy of reform should also be strengthened in the future.
作者 高洋 GAO Yang(Institute of Education,The Open University of China,Beijing 100039)
出处 《比较教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第3期79-85,111,共8页 International and Comparative Education
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目“高等学校质量年度报告发布制度研究”(项目编号:16YJA880021)。
关键词 美国 高校年度报告 文化-认知调查 正当性 America the annual reporting of universities cultural-cognitive survey legitimacy
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献20

  • 1潘艺林.“学生评教”信奉什么教育哲学?[J].教育理论与实践,2005,25(12):27-31. 被引量:55
  • 2天野郁夫.高等教育の構造変動.教育社会学研究,2002,(70):39-58.
  • 3鲍威.進学者の目に映つた中国民営高等教育[J].東京大学教育学研究科紀要第42卷:223-233.
  • 4Trow,Martin.On Mass Higher Education and Institutional Diversity[R].Samuel Neaman Institute for Advanced Studies in Science and Technology,Technion-Israel Institute of Technology.2003.
  • 5Ainley & Johnson.The Course Experience Questionnaire 2000 Interim Report[R].ACER,2001.
  • 6Center for Postsecondary Research,School of Education Indiana University.Engaged Learning:Fostering Success for All Students (Annual Report 2006)[R].[2007-05-01].http://nsse,iub.edu/NSSE_ 2006_ Annual_ Report/docs/NSSE_ 2006_ Annual_ Report.pdf.
  • 7Saenz,V.B.& Barrera,D.S.Findings from the 2005 College Student Survey (CSS):National aggregates[R].Los Angeles:Higher Education Research Institute,2007.
  • 8高靓:《高校教师苦心开出课程,大学生以对付心态选修》,http://www.edu.cn/gao-jiao-news一367/20120420/t20120420-768145.shtml.
  • 9吴绍春:《对美国大学学生评教的研究和思考》,《中国教育报》,2007第12月24日,第5版.
  • 10别敦荣,孟凡.论学生评教及高校教学质量保障体系的改善[J].高等教育研究,2007,28(12):77-83. 被引量:231

共引文献98

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部