期刊文献+

“翻转课堂”模式下学生课堂学习参与度量表编制 被引量:28

The Development of the Scale of Students’Engagement in Classroom Learning Under the Flipped Classroom Teaching Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 学生课堂学习参与度是教学效果的决定性因素。经文献分析,"翻转课堂"模式下学生课堂学习参与度涉及注意力集中度、师生互动、生生互动、课堂兴趣度、批判性思维和课堂满意度六个维度。经检验,以此为基础开发的量表的总Cronbach's Alpha系数为0.88,各特定条目与其他条目汇总的Pearson相关系数和剔除某一条目后的Cronbach's Alpha系数结果良好,探索性因子分析中累积贡献方差率为66.29%,特征值≥1的公因子有6个,与设计量表前得出的评估指标相吻合,验证性因子分子中参与度理论模型与数据拟合结果良好。结果表明:此量表具有很好的信度和效度,能够较为科学地检测"翻转课堂"模式下学生课堂学习的参与程度。 Students’engagement in classroom learning is a decisive factor that influences the teaching effect.According to literature analysis,students’engagement in classroom learning in the mode of the flipped classroom involves six dimensions:concentration ratio,interaction between teachers and students,interactions between students,classroom interestingness,critical thinking,and classroom satisfaction.Upon examination,the total Cronbach’s Alpha coefficient of the scale,which is developed on the basis of the six dimensions,is 0.88.The Pearson correlation coefficients between the particular item and other items and the Cronbach’s Alpha coefficients after an item is removed are all good.In exploratory factor analysis,the cumulative contribution variance rate was up to 66.29%,and there are six common factors with eigenvalue(≥1),which is consistent with the evaluation indexes obtained before designing the scale.In confirmatory factor analysis,the theoretical model of participation evaluation indicators has a good fit with data.The results show that this scale has good reliability and validity,and can reflect students’participation in classroom learning more scientifically.
作者 赵富春 汤亚 倪亚红 余秀兰 Zhao Fuchun;Tang Ya;Ni Yahong;Yu Xiulan
出处 《江苏高教》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第4期66-72,共7页 Jiangsu Higher Education
基金 江苏省2018年度教育科学“十三五”课题“大学学困生心理结构优化与调适”(D/2018/01/32) 2020年度江苏省社科应用研究精品工程外语类课题“大学英语教育中跨文化交际能力培养机制研究”(20SWB-05)。
关键词 翻转课堂 学习参与度 量表 flipped classroom student engagement scale
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献50

  • 1周作宇,周廷勇.大学生就读经验:评价高等教育质量的一个新视角[J].大学(研究),2007(1):27-31. 被引量:74
  • 2钟启泉.概念重建与我国课程创新——与《认真对待“轻视知识”的教育思潮》作者商榷[J].北京大学教育评论,2005,3(1):48-57. 被引量:220
  • 3金建生.课堂范式的历史嬗变及现实重建[J].教育研究与实验,2005(4):32-36. 被引量:11
  • 4章建石.增值评价法-关注学生的实际进步.评鉴双月刊,2007,(8):3-3.
  • 5Pascarella, E. T. &. Terenzizi,P. T. How College Affects Students: A Third Decade of Research[Z]. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2005 : 602.
  • 6Kuh, G. D. What We're Learning about Student Engagement from NSSE: Benchmarks for Effective Educational Practices[Z]. Change, 2003, 35(2):24-32.
  • 7Pace,C. R. Achievement and the Quality of Student Effort [C]. Paper presented at a Meeting of the National Commission on Excellence in Education, 1982.
  • 8Austin,A. Achieving Education Excellence: A Critical Assessment of Priorities and Practices in Higher Education[Z]. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1985.
  • 9Tinto, V. Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition [M]. Chicago :University of Chicago Press, 1987.
  • 10Chickering,A. W. , and Gamson,Z. F. Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education[J]. AAHE Bulletin, 1987,39(7) :3-7.

共引文献910

同被引文献286

引证文献28

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部