期刊文献+

建筑结构抗倒塌分析方法 被引量:1

Study on the anti-collapse method of building structure
下载PDF
导出
摘要 建筑结构的倒塌可分为两种模式:建筑物侧向增量倒塌与竖向连续倒塌。本文论述了建筑物结构失效模式的如何辨识以及侧向倒塌能力点确定准则的相关研究进展。介绍了现有的连续倒塌研究方法,尤其是基于备用荷载路径的竖向非线性动力分析方法。为建筑结构整体抗震可靠度研究以及结构抗震性能评定与设计提供参考。 The collapse of building structure can be analyzed with two modes:lateral incremental collapse and vertical progressive collapse.The research progresses of failure mode identification and lateral collapse capacity point determination criteria of building structures are discussed.Focuses are placed on the analysis of the existing structural progressive collapse design methods,especially the vertical nonlinear dynamic analysis method based on the standby load path.It provides a reference for the study of the overall seismic reliability of the structure and the evaluation and design of the seismic performance of the structure.
作者 王勃 张智玮 董丽欣 WANG Bo;ZHANG Zhiwei;DONG Lixin(School of Civil Engineering,Jilin Jianzhu University,Changchun 130118, China;Jilin Structural and Earthquake Resistance Technology Innovation Center,Changchun 130118, China)
出处 《四川建材》 2021年第4期63-65,共3页 Sichuan Building Materials
基金 国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFC0806100) 国家自然科学基金项目(51178206) 吉林省高校“十三五”科研规划项目(JJKH20170253KJ)。
关键词 地震易损性 侧向倒塌 连续倒塌 IM-DM准则 备用荷载路径法 seismic vulnerability lateral collapse continuous collapse IM-DM criteria alternate load path method
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献35

  • 1Bertero V V. Stength and deformation capacities of buildings under extreme environments [ M ]//Structural Engineering and Structural Mechanics, Pister KS( ed. ). Prentice - Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1977 : 211 -255.
  • 2Luco N, Cornell C A. Effects of connection fractures on SMRF seismic drift demands [ J]. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 2000, 126: 127 - 136.
  • 3Luco N, Cornell C A. Effects of random connection fractures on demands and reliability for a 3-storey Pre-Northridge SMRF structure [ C ]//Proceedings of the 6th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering:244. EERI: El Cerrito, CA: Seattle, Washington, 1998:1 -12.
  • 4Bazzurro P, Cornell C A. Seismic hazard analysis for nonlinear structures. Ⅰ: Methodology [J]. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 1994, 120(11) : 3320 -3344.
  • 5Bazzurro P, Cornell C A. Seismic hazard analysis for nonlinear structures.Ⅱ: Applications [ J]. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 1994, 120 ( 11 ) : 3345 - 3365.
  • 6Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Recommended seismic design criteria for new steel moment - frame buildings [ R]. FEMA Report 350, 2000.
  • 7Fragiadakis M, Vamvatsikos D, Panadrakakis M. Evaluation of the influence of vertical irregularities on the seismic performance of a nine -storey steel frame [ J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2006, 35 (12) : 1489 -1509.
  • 8Mander J B, Dhakala R P, Mashikoet N, et al. Incremental dynamic analysis applied to seismic financial risk assessment of bridges [ J ]. Engineering Structures, 2007, 29( 10): 2662-2672.
  • 9Charney F A. Applications in incremental dynamic analysis[ C ]//Proceedings of the Structures Congress and Exposition, Metropolis and Beyond. Proceedings of the 2005 Structures Congress and the 2005 Forensic Engineering Symposium, 2005 : 1827 - 1834.
  • 10Vamvatsikos D, Cornell C A. Incremental dynamic analysis [ J ]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2002, 31 (3) : 491 -514.

共引文献132

同被引文献7

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部