摘要
舆论监督和司法审判的有效互动,是二者相互关系的终极目标,基于哈贝马斯"商谈法律观"的"商谈互动"理论为这一目标的实现提供了理论和现实的可能性。同时,由于舆论监督和司法审判之间在工作机制、话语体系等方面的差异,使二者的商谈互动很难进入"理性自觉"的状态,因此互动过程中的"信息不对称"在所难免,这就需要借助制度性的力量,规范协调舆论监督和司法审判之间的互动关系。
The effective interaction is the ultimate goal of the relationship between public opinion supervision and judicial trial.The theory of"negotiation interaction"based on Jürgen Habermas’"legal view of negotiation"provides theoretical and practical possibilities for the realization of this goal.At the same time,due to the differences in working mechanism and discourse system between public opinion supervision and judicial trial,it is difficult to enter the state of"rational and conscious"in their negotiation and interaction.Therefore,"information asymmetry"is inevitable in the process of interaction.It is necessary to standardize and coordinate the interactive relationship between public opinion supervision and judicial trial with the help of institutional forces.
作者
李昌
冀翌昕
Li Chang;Ji Yixin
出处
《传媒观察》
CSSCI
2021年第4期51-58,共8页
Media Observer
基金
国家社会科学基金“新时代中国对湄公河国家国际传播能力建设研究”(18BXW067)
云南省哲学社会科学规划专项课题“党的十九大精神在云南边境少数民族地区传播效果提升策略研究”(YB2017091)
昆明理工大学引进人才基金资助项目“政治传播与傣族村寨的国家认同建构研究”(KKZ3201455033)的研究成果。
关键词
舆论监督
司法审判
“商谈互动”
信息不对称
制度建设
public opinion supervision
judicial trial
"negotiation interaction"
information asymmetry
system construction
