期刊文献+

美国“印太战略”框架下针对南海问题的联盟新样式 被引量:19

On the New Pattern of Alliance of America in the South China Sea Under the Framework of Indo-Pacific Strategy
原文传递
导出
摘要 随着"印太战略"的出台和实施,美国加大了在南海地区进行战略经营的力度。美国针对南海问题着力构建联盟新样式即小多边合作,采取"美国+关键国家""美国+南海争议国家""开放型小多边"三种小多边安全合作形式,全面干预南海事务,导致南海争端中物质性利益与非物质性诉求相交织,南海问题更趋复杂和严峻。虽然囿于地区国家的务实外交、大国平衡手段以及对主导国的不信任等内生性局限,南海小多边安全行动实质性进展不大,却也带来了地区热点复杂化、中美竞争加剧等安全挑战。惟其如此,中国需慎重研判应对,支持东盟在地区事务中的中心性,倡导多边主义,以更加长远和战略性的思维和行为塑造南海地区格局。 With the introduction and implementation of"Indo-Pacific strategy",the United States has intensified its strategic operation in the South China Sea.The United States is striving to build a new form of alliance for the South China Sea issue,namely minilateral cooperation,taking three forms of"the U.S.+key countries","the U.S.+disputed countries in the South China Sea"and"open minilateral"to comprehensively intervene in the South China Sea affairs,resulting in the interweaving of material interests and non-material claims in the South China Sea disputes,making the South China Sea issue more complex and severe.Due to the endogenous limitations of pragmatic diplomacy of regional countries,the means of balancing major powers and distrust of the leading country,the substantial progress of minilateral security actions in the South China Sea is not great,but it also brings security challenges such as the complexity of regional hot spots and intensified competition between China and the United States.Only in this way,China should carefully study and judge the response,support ASEAN’s centrality in regional affairs,advocate multilateralism,and shape the pattern of the South China Sea region with more long-term and strategic thinking and behavior.
作者 王联合 Wang Lianhe
出处 《国际观察》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第1期106-130,共25页 International Review
关键词 联盟样式 小多边 南海问题 美国“印太战略” 中国南海战略 Patten of Alliance Minilateralism The South China Sea The U.S.Indo-Pacific Strategy Suggestions for China
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献113

  • 1《印美联合声明称担忧南海争端中方对此发出警告》,人民网,http://military.people.com.cn/n/2014/lOlO/c1011-25804265.html.
  • 2赵青海:《从“亚太”到“印太”》,国际网,http://memo.cfisnet.com/2013/0821/1296727.html.
  • 3Hillary Rodham Clinton, " America's Engagement in the Asia-Pacific", United States Department of Defense, October 28, 2010.
  • 4Hillary Rodham Clinton, "America's Pacific century", United States Department of Defense, October 11, 2011.
  • 5"Quadrennial Defense Review 2014", United States Department of Defense, March 4, 2014, p. 17.
  • 6Cf. Rory Medcalf, "The Indo-Pacific: What's in a Name?", American Interest, October 2013.
  • 7"Locklear Calls for lndo-Asia-Pacific Cooperation", US Department of Defense, February 8, 2013, http: //ar- chive, defense, gov/news/newsarticle, aspx? id = 119243.
  • 8"Maritime Cooperation in the Indo-Pacific Region", May 31, 2013, http: //www. apcss, org/maritime - cooperation - in - the - Indo-Pacific - region/.
  • 9Michael A. McDevitt, "The Long Littoral Project : Summary Report A Maritime Perspective on Indo-Pacific Securi- ty", June 2013, https : //www. cna. org/CNA_ files/PDF/IRP -2012 - U -2321 - Final. pdf.
  • 10James R. Holmes, Andrew C. Winner and Toshi Yo- shihara, Indian Naval Strategy in the Twenty-first Century, New York: Rout- ledge, 2009, p107.

共引文献56

引证文献19

二级引证文献166

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部