期刊文献+

高管薪酬信息披露的经济后果研究

Research on Economic Consequences of Information disclosure of executive compensation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 高管薪酬信息披露有助于提升公司薪酬契约透明度及治理效率,但同时增加了公司的信息披露成本。因此,高管薪酬信息披露对于公司的经济后果研究是一个值得探讨的话题。通过高管薪酬信息披露对薪酬水平、薪酬业绩敏感性的影响,观测我国高管薪酬信息披露的后果,并进一步观测不同产权性质公司间的影响差异。结果表明:信息披露政策抑制了高管薪酬水平,加强了薪酬业绩敏感性,相比于国有企业,非国有企业的高管薪酬信息披露政策效果更显著。 The information disclosure of executive compensation helps to improve the transparency of compensation contract and governance efficiency in company,but it also increases information disclosure costs of company.Therefore,the economic consequences of information disclosure of executive compensation to the companies is a topic worth exploring.The article observes the consequences of information disclosure of executive compensation in China by studying the impact of information disclosure of executive compensation on compensation levels and Pay-Performance Sensitivity (PPS),and furthermore,it observes the differences of the effects between companies of various property right The results show that the information disclosure policy restrains the level of executive compensation and strengthens the Pay-Performance Sensitivity (PPS).Compared with state-owned enterprises,information disclosure policy for executive compensation of non-state-owned enterprises is more effective.
作者 杜闪 DU Shan
出处 《当代会计》 2021年第1期13-15,共3页 Contemporary Accounting
关键词 薪酬信息披露 薪酬业绩敏感性 产权性质 Salary Information Disclosure Salary Performance Sensitivity,Nature of Property Rights
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献39

  • 1陆正飞,魏涛.配股后业绩下降:盈余管理后果与真实业绩滑坡[J].会计研究,2006(8):52-59. 被引量:150
  • 2Brian, L. C., L. Tihanyi, T. R. Crook, and K. A. Gangloff. 2014. Tournament Theory: Thirty Years of Contests and Competitions. Journal of Management, 40 ( 1 ) : 16 -47.
  • 3Chen, J. , M. Ezzamel, and Z. Cai. 2011. Managerial Power Theory, Tournament Theory, and Executive Pay in Chi- na. Journal of Corporate Finance, 17 (4) : 1176 - 1199.
  • 4Claessens, S, S. Djankov, J. P. H. Fan, and L. H. P. Lang. 2002. Disentan-ing the Incentive and En-ench- ment Effects of Large Shareholdings. The Journal of Finance, 57 (6): 2741 -2771.
  • 5Fan, J. P. H., and T. J. Wong. 2002. Corporate Ownership Structure and the Informativeness of Accounting Earnings in East Asia. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33 (3) : 401 -'425.
  • 6Faulkender, M. , and J. Yang. 2010. Inside the Black Box: the Role and Composition of Compensation Peer Groups. Journal of Financial Economics, 96 (2) : 257 - 270.
  • 7Hu, F. , X. Pan, and G. Tian. 2013. Does CEO Pay Dispersion Matter in an Emerging Market? Evidence from China's Listed Firms. Pacific - Basin Finance Journal, 24 (C) : 235 - 255.
  • 8Luo, W., Y. Zhang and N. Zhu. 2011. Bank Owner- ship and Executive Perquisites: New Evidence from An Emer- ging Market. Journal of Corporate Finance, 17 (2): 352 - 370.
  • 9Peng, M. W., and Y. Jiang. 2010. Institutions be- hind Family Ownership and Control in Large Firms. Journal of Management Studies, 47 (2) : 253 -273.
  • 10Radhakrishnan, G., and J. Sudarshan. 2012. Private Control Benefits and Earnings Management: Evidence from In- sider Controlled Finns. Journal of Accounting Research, 50 (1) : 117 -157.

共引文献295

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部