摘要
目的探讨多参数流式细胞术(MFC)与实时定量聚合酶链反应技术(RQ-PCR)两种方法检测费城染色体阳性(Ph^(+))急性B淋巴细胞白血病(B-ALL)患者异基因造血干细胞移植(allo-HSCT)前微小残留病(MRD)的预后意义。方法回顾性分析2014年7月至2018年2月在北京大学血液病研究所接受allo-HSCT的280例Ph^(+)B-ALL患者,同时用MFC和RQ-PCR法(检测BCR-ABL融合基因表达)检测移植前MRD。结果RQ-PCR与MFC检测MRD具有相关性(rs=0.435,P<0.001)。MFC、RQ-PCR法检测移植前MRD的阳性率分别为25.7%(72/280)、60.7%(170/280)。移植前MFC-MRD阳性组患者移植后白血病3年累积复发率(CIR)明显高于MFC-MRD阴性组(23.6%对8.6%,P<0.001)。RQ-PCR检测BCR/ABL融合基因阳性组(RQ-PCR MRD阳性组)的3年CIR、非复发死亡(NRM)、无白血病生存(LFS)、总生存(OS)与BCR/ABL融合基因阴性组(RQ-PCR MRD阴性组)相比差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。移植前RQ-PCR MRD≥1%组比<1%组具有更高的3年CIR(23.1%对11.4%,P=0.032)、更低的LFS率(53.8%对74.4%,P=0.015)与OS率(57.7%对79.1%,P=0.009)。多因素分析显示,移植前MFC-MRD阳性是影响移植后CIR的危险因素(HR=2.488,95%CI 1.216~5.088,P=0.013),移植前RQ-PCR MRD≥1%是影响LFS(HR=2.272,95%CI 1.225~4.215,P<0.001)、OS(HR=2.472,95%CI 1.289~4.739,P=0.006)的危险因素。MFC检测MRD预测复发的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)分别为48.50%、77.56%、23.62%、87.16%。以RQ-PCR MRD≥1%预测复发的敏感性、特异性、PPV、NPV分别为23.00%、88.59%、17.15%、91.84%。移植前MFC-MRD阳性或RQ-PCR MRD≥1%二者任一成立为指标预测移植后复发的敏感性、特异性、PPV、NPV分别为54.29%、73.88%、45.70%、91.87%。结论MFC和RQ-PCR法检测移植前MRD水平均可预测Ph^(+)B-ALL患者移植预后。移植前MFC-MRD阳性是移植后复发的危险因素。联合使用两种方法(移植前MFC-MRD阳性状态或RQ-PCR MRD≥1%成立)可提高预测移植后复发的敏感性、阳性预测值与阴性预测值,有助于更好筛选出高危患者。
Objective To explore the different values of minimal residual disease(MRD)detection by multiparameter flow cytometry(MFC)and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction(RQ-PCR)before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation(HSCT)for predicting relapse,leukemia-free survival(LFS),and overall survival(OS)in Philadelphia chromosome-positive ALL(Ph^(+)ALL).Methods A retrospective study(n=280)was performed.MRD was determined using multiparameter flow cytometry and RQ-PCR.Results MRD analysis with MFC and RQ-PCR of the BCR-ABL fusion transcript showed a strong correlation before transplantation.The positive rates of MRD detected by MFC and RQ-PCR before transplantation were 25.7%(72/280)and 60.7%(170/280),respectively.MFC MRDpositive(MRDpos)Ph^(+)ALL patients had a higher 3 year cumulative incidences of relapse(CIR)than did MFC MRD-negative(MRDneg)Ph^(+)ALL patients(23.6%vs 8.6%;P<0.001).However,the RQ-PCR MRDpos group had similar rates of 3 year OS,LFS,and NRM compared with those in the RQ-PCR MRDneg group.Moreover,patients with RQ-PCR MRD≥1%experienced higher 3 year CIR(23.1%vs 11.4%;P=0.032),lower LFS(53.8%vs 74.4%;P=0.015),and OS(57.7%vs 79.1%;P=0.009)compared with the RQ-PCR MRD<1%group.Multivariate analyses confirmed the association of MFC MRD status and RQ-PCR MRD≥1%with outcomes(P<0.05).The sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value(PPV),and negative predictive value(NPV)of MFC detection MRD to predict recurrence were 48.50%,77.56%,23.62%,and 87.16%,respectively.Moreover,the sensitivity,specificity,PPV,and NPV were 23.00%,88.59%,17.15%,and 91.84%,respectively,when RQ-PCR MRD≥1%was used to predict recurrence.Additionally,the sensitivity,specificity,PPV,and NPV were 54.29%,73.88%,45.7%and 91.87%,respectively,when MRD-positive status before transplantation(MFC MRDpos or RQ-PCR MRD≥1%)was used to predict recurrence after transplantation.Conclusions Both MFC and RQ-PCR detection of pretransplant MRD levels can predict the prognosis of Ph^(+)B-ALL patients receiving allogeneic HSCT.MFC MRD-positive status before transplantation is the risk factor of leukemia recurrence after transplantation.The combined use of the two methods(MFC MRDpos or RQ-PCR MRD≥1%)can improve the sensitivity,PPV,and NPV of predicting recurrence and help to better screen high-risk patients for intervention,thereby improving clinical efficacy.
作者
王欣玉
常英军
刘艳荣
秦亚溱
许兰平
王昱
张晓辉
闫晨华
孙于谦
黄晓军
赵晓甦
Wang Xinyu;Chang Yingjun;Liu Yanrong;Qin Yaqin;Xu Lanping;Wang Yu;Zhang Xiaohui;Yan Chenhua;Sun Yuqian;Huang Xiaojun;Zhao Xiaosu(Peking University People's Hospital&Peking University Institute of Hematology,National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease,Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation,Beijing 100044,China)
出处
《中华血液学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2021年第2期116-123,共8页
Chinese Journal of Hematology
基金
国家自然科学基金(81670175、81870137)。