韩愈琴诗公案之再阐释——以两宋文人的争议为中心

A Further Discussion Regarding HAN Yu’s Poem of Qin——Focus on Scholar’s Arguments in the Song Dynasties

欧阳修对韩愈《听颖师弹琴》的评价包含文学和艺术两重标准,其本意是在肯定韩诗造语奇丽的基础上,指出此诗的风格并不适合表现听琴。僧义海、善琴者皆断章取义,误读欧公本意,将韩诗落实为琴声和指法,并根据自己的知识立场和艺术体验来另辟新说。俞德邻推论韩诗意在表达对颖师的不满,但由于其阐释存在显而易见的逻辑硬伤,其观点难以成立。正是上述观点错位和逻辑误区,推动了韩愈琴诗公案的议论升级,也折射出诸家对《听颖师弹琴》中的文理、物理和情理的认知差异,文人围绕韩诗的争论与解释则共同推动《听颖师弹琴》的经典化。

The comment on HAN Yu’s Listening to Master Ying Playing Qin by OUYANG Xiu contain a dual standard of both literature and artistry,considering the poem was not suitable for describing Qin performance listening.YiHai bonze and Shan-Qin-Zhe(the one who’s good at playing Qin)both interpreted the comment out of context,translating the poem into actual Qin music and fingering,and developed new theories based on their own knowledge standpoint and artistic experience.YU Delin inferred that Han’s poem were mean to express his dissatisfaction towards master Ying.These misjudged perspectives and logic mistakes upgraded arguments regarding HAN Yu’s poem,and refracted the recognition discrepancies in liberal arts,physics,and emotive reasons among different scholars.These arguments and interpretations regarding the poem contributed to the canonization of the poem.