扎根理论在我国体育学研究中的运用情况与问题反思

Application and Reflection of Grounded Theory in the Domestic Studies of Sport Science

以建构理论为研究旨趣的扎根理论因其严谨的操作过程,得到了国内诸多体育学者的青睐。通过对中国知网相关文献回顾,在梳理扎根理论核心要素的基础上,探讨我国体育学研究中运用扎根理论时存在的认识偏差并提出建议。当前我国体育学研究中,倾向于程序化扎根理论流派,在选题上呈现多元化趋向。但在具体操作上存在不足:(1)除缺乏某一核心要素外,学界对于"连续性比较-理论性抽样-理论性饱和"的动态关系存在认知不足;(2)流派间混淆、术语错用;(3)对方法的混合使用易出现自下而上与自上而下内核式混淆;(4)对程序化扎根理论编码的原则性认识不足。基于以上问题,提出了相应的改善建议。

Because of its strict operating process, grounded theory which focuses on constructing theory has gained the popularity among the domestic scholars and lots of core journals in sport science. Because of its school differences and unclear understanding of the core operation in ontology, there are some problems in academic circles still need clarifying. Through the review of literature in CNKI, this study discusses understanding deviation of domestic grounded theory research in sport science and put forward some suggestions on the basis of combing the core elements on grounded theory research. Studies have shown that there is a trend of diversification in topic selection and using the proceduralised grounded theory in sport science in China. However, there are still the following deficiencies in the specific operation: 1) in addition to the lack of a certain core element, there are cognitive deficiencies on dynamic relationship among constant comparisons, theoretical sampling and theoretical saturation;2) here are confusions in different schools of grounded theory and misuses in terms;3) the mixed use of methods is likely to be confused in paradigm;4) there is a lack of understanding of the coding principle in proceduralised grounded theory research. On this basis, this study puts forward some corresponding improvement suggestions.