期刊文献+

“连带”与“脱亚”的共谋——近代早期日本“亚细亚主义”悖论性格之新探

The Complicity of“Joint”and“Out of Asia”——A new exploration of the paradoxical character of“Asianism”in early modern Japan
下载PDF
导出
摘要 探究近代日本早期“亚细亚主义”的发展脉络不仅能捕捉日本的对外制策趋势和舆论导向,还有助于理解作为亚洲一国的日本何以坚持对东亚乃至世界发动法西斯主义侵略战争。千百年来,对华夷秩序“中心”的反叛与对抗几乎贯穿了身处区域秩序边缘的日本的所有对外政策,地处华夷秩序版图的“边缘”使得日本具有将大陆“中心”相对化并克服的可能,而这也是造成早期亚细亚主义悖论表述的深层历史原因。幕末明治初期,西力东渐给日本摧毁旧华夷秩序的机会,此时“亚细亚主义”指向亚洲内部,日本表面宣扬“亚洲连带”一致对外,私下却迅速“西化”并染指东亚,并在实现对清平等后逐步由“亚洲连带论”走向公然侵亚的“脱亚论”。两者间看似言论相斥,实乃侵略扩张的一体两面,“连带”与“脱亚”的正反表述在甲午胜出的事实面前划为同一。 Exploring the development of"asianism"in early modern Japan can not only capture the trend of Japan's foreign policy and public opinion direction,but also help to understand why Japan,as an Asian country,persisted in launching fascist aggression war against east Asia and even the world.For thousands of years,the rebellion and confrontation against the"center"of the Chinese-barbarian system have almost run through all the foreign policies of Japan,which is on the edge of the regional order.Being located on the"edge"of the Chinese-barbarian system makes it possible for Japan to relativize and overcome the"center"of the mainland,which is also the deep historical reason for the expression of the paradox of early asianism.In the early Meiji period,western powers gradually gave Japan the opportunity to destroy the old Chinese-barbarian system.At this time,"asianism"was pointed at the inside of Asia.Japan outwardly advocated"Asian joint",but secretly quickly"westernized"and got its hands on east Asia.They seem to be mutually exclusive,but they are the two sides of aggression and expansion.The positive and negative statements of"joint"and"out of aisa"are the same in front of the fact that they won in the Sino-Japanese war of 1894-1895.
作者 万齐岭 WAN Qiling(The Centre for Studies of Fujian and Taiwan,Fujian Normal University,Fuzhou,Fujian 350007)
出处 《武夷学院学报》 2021年第2期36-43,共8页 Journal of Wuyi University
关键词 亚细亚主义 亚洲连带 脱亚论 华夷秩序 asianism joint out of aisa the Chinese-barbarian system
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献33

  • 1韩东育.第三种传统[J].书城,2007(7):55-58. 被引量:2
  • 2盛邦和.19世纪与20世纪之交的日本亚洲主义[J].历史研究,2000(3):125-135. 被引量:40
  • 3沟口雄三,赵京华.创造日中间知识的共同空间[J].读书,2001(5):3-11. 被引量:26
  • 4.《不可轻视清国论》.《邮电报知新闻》,明治十一年(1878年)一月十二日.
  • 5.[日]《日本历史·近代4》.岩波书店,1962年.第124页.
  • 6[日]松浦玲.《明治的海舟与亚细亚》.岩波书店,1987年,第102,103页
  • 7[日]明治17年4月13日《朝野新闻》.
  • 8[日]杂贺博爱著.《杉田鹑山翁》,翁杉会,1928年,546页.
  • 9[日]《学问与知识人》,《日本近代思想大系》,岩波书店,1989年,95页.
  • 10[日]冈仓天心.《日本的觉醒》,岩波书店,1993年,14页,44页.

共引文献62

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部