期刊文献+

针对性护理对冠心病介入术后乳腺癌患者围手术期血栓风险的评估与影响 被引量:10

Targeted nursing for breast cancer patients after coronary heart disease stenting risk assessment and impact of perioperative thrombus
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:分析冠心病介入术后乳腺癌患者围手术期的抗凝治疗针对性护理对血栓风险的影响。方法:数字选择我科2017年至2018年收治的冠心病介入术后乳腺癌围手术期60例患者。对照组予以常规护理方法,观察组予以针对性的优化护理;分析两组患者发生血栓风险系数高低。结果:观察组的血栓风险系数较对照组的明显降低。结论:对冠心病介入术后乳腺癌围手术期患者实行针对性护理对降低患者血栓风险有着积极的临床意义。 Objective:To analyze the effect of anticoagulant therapy on thrombosis risk in breast cancer patients after stenting coronary heart disease during perioperative period.Methods:A total of 60 patients with breast cancer during perioperative period after stenting coronary heart disease admitted to our department from 2017 to 2019 were selected.The control group was given routine nursing method,and the experimental group was given targeted optimized nursing;The risk coefficient of thrombosis was analyzed in the two groups.Results:The thrombus risk coefficient of the experimental group was significantly lower than that of the control group.Conclusions:It is of positive clinical significance to carry out targeted nursing for patients with breast cancer during perioperative period after stenting coronary heart disease to reduce the risk of thrombosis in patients.
作者 孙亚珂 张红 骆成玉 SUN Yake;ZHANG Hong;LUO Chengyu(Department of General Surgery,Beijing Anzhen Hospital,Capital Medical University,Beijing Institute of Heart,Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases,Beijing 100029,China)
出处 《心肺血管病杂志》 CAS 2021年第4期364-367,共4页 Journal of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Diseases
关键词 针对性护理 围手术期 血栓风险 Targeted nursing Perioperative Thrombosis risk
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献82

  • 1刘芹.临床护理路径在下肢骨折术后并发深静脉血栓中的临床应用[J].医学信息(医学与计算机应用),2016,29(34):168-169. 被引量:6
  • 2陈文革.β-七叶皂苷钠在下肢骨折术后肿胀治疗中的应用效果分析[J].中国生化药物杂志,2014,34(4):90-92. 被引量:30
  • 3张保宁,邵志敏,乔新民,李波,姜军,杨名添,王水,宋三泰,张斌,杨红健.中国乳腺癌保乳治疗的前瞻性多中心研究[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2005,27(11):680-684. 被引量:247
  • 4郝德会.早期护理干预对下肢骨折术后并发深静脉血栓形成的影响[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2007,13(16):24-25. 被引量:15
  • 5ZFisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of arandomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med, 2002, 347:1233-1241.
  • 6Veronesi U, Caseinelli N, Mariani L, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical masteetomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med, 2002, 347 : 1227-1232.
  • 7Ganz P, Kwan L, Stanton AL, et al. Quality of life at the end of primary treatment of breast cancer: first results from the moving beyond cancer randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2004, 96: 376-387.
  • 8Du X, Freeman DH Jr, Syblik DA. What drove changes in the use of breast conserving surgery since the early 1980s? The role of the clinical trial, celebrity action and an NIH consensus statement. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2000, 62:71-79.
  • 9Katipamula R, Degnim AC, Hoskin T, et al. Trends in mastectomy rates at the Mayo Clinic Rochester: effect of surgical year and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Oncol, 2009, 27:4082-4088.
  • 10McGure KP, Santillan AA, Kanr P, et al. Are mastectomies on the rise.'? A 13-year trend analysis of the selection of mastectomy vsrsus breast conservation therapy in 5865 patients. Ann Surg Oncol, 2009, 16:2682-2690.

共引文献191

同被引文献132

引证文献10

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部