期刊文献+

血清CEA、AFP、CA72-4联合检测评价胃癌分化程度的效能 被引量:3

Efficacy of combined detection of serum CEA,AFP and CA72-4 in evaluating the differentiation of gastric cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨血清癌胚抗原(CEA)、甲胎蛋白(AFP)、糖类抗原(CA72-4)联合检测对胃癌分化程度的评价效能。方法选取2019年2月至2020年9月合肥市第三人民医院收治的92例胃癌患者,并招募92例健康志愿者,分别记为胃癌组和健康组,开展前瞻性研究。两组均采用酶联免疫吸附试验检测血清CEA、AFP和CA72-4水平并进行比较;比较胃癌组不同分化程度患者血清CEA、AFP和CA72-4水平,分析三者联合对胃癌分化程度的评价效能。结果胃癌组血清CEA、AFP和CA72-4水平均高于健康组(P<0.05)。胃癌组未/低分化患者血清CEA、AFP和CA72-4水平均高于中/高分化患者(P<0.05)。血清CEA、AFP和CA72-4水平联合对胃癌组未/低分化评价的灵敏度和AUC分别为100.00%和0.917,均高于单独评价,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),特异度与单独评价对比差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论胃癌患者血清CEA、AFP和CA72-4水平均较高,且未/低分化患者水平更高。三者联合对胃癌分化程度评估效能理想。 Objective To investigate the efficacy of serum carcinoembryonic antigen(CEA),alpha fetoprotein(AFP)and carbohydrate antigen(CA72-4)in evaluating the differentiation of gastric cancer.Methods Ninety-two patients with gastric cancer treated in Hefei people′s Hospital from February 2020 to September 2019 and ninety-two healthy volunteers were enrolled as gastric cancer group and healthy group respectively to carry out a prospective research.Serum CEA,AFP and CA72-4 levels were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay(ELISA).The serum levels of CEA,AFP and CA72-4 in patients with different degrees of differentiation were compared,and the efficacy of the combination of the three methods in the evaluation of gastric cancer differentiation was analyzed.Results The serum levels of CEA,AFP and CA72-4 in the gastric cancer group were higher than those in the healthy group(P<0.05).The serum levels of CEA,AFP and CA72-4 in undifferentiated/poorly differentiated patients were higher than those in moderately/highly differentiated patients(P<0.05).The sensitivity and AUC of serum CEA,AFP and CA72-4 levels were 100.00%and 0.917 respectively,which were higher than those of single evaluation(P<0.05),but there was no significant difference between specificity and single evaluation(P>0.05).Conclusion The serum CEA,AFP and CA72-4 levels in patients with gastric cancer are higher,and the levels of CEA,AFP and CA72-4 are higher in patients with undifferentiated and poorly differentiated gastric cancer.
作者 李绍雪 张承顺 陈文生 LI Shao-xue;ZHANG Cheng-shun;CHEN Wen-sheng(Department of Gastroenterology,Hefei Third Clinical College,Anhui Medical University(Hefei Third People′s Hospital),Hefei,Anhui 230042;Department of Gastroenterology,Southwest Hospital of Army Medical University,Chongqing 400000)
出处 《现代消化及介入诊疗》 2021年第3期305-308,313,共5页 Modern Interventional Diagnosis and Treatment in Gastroenterology
基金 国家科技支撑专项惠民计划子课题(CSTC2015jcsf10001)。
关键词 癌胚抗原 甲胎蛋白 糖类抗原72-4 胃癌 分化 Carcinoembryonic antigen Alpha fetoprotein Carbohydrate antigen 72-4 Gastric cancer Differentiation
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

二级参考文献109

  • 1Chao Xu Zheng~1 Wen Hua Zhan~1 Ji Zong Zhao~2 Dong Zheng~3 Dong Ping Wang~1 Yu Long He~1 Zhang Qing Zheng~1 ~1Department of General Surgery,~2Laboratory of Surgery,~3Department of Medicine,First Affiliated Hospital,Sun Yat-Sen University of Medical Sciences,Guangzhou 510080,Guangdong Province,ChinaDr.Chao Xu Zheng now working as a surgeon and lecturer in the Department of General Surgery,First Affiliated Hospital,Sun Yat-Sen University of Medical Sciences,who is a Ph.D.student,having 7 papers published..The prognostic value of preoperative serum levels of CEA,CA19-9 and CA72-4 in patients with colorectal cancer[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2001,7(3):431-434. 被引量:25
  • 2Michael Luis,Ana Tavares,Liliana S Carvalho,Lúcio Lara-Santos,António Araújo,Ramon Andrade de Mello.Personalizing therapies for gastric cancer: Molecular mechanisms and novel targeted therapies[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2013,19(38):6383-6397. 被引量:6
  • 3李勤广,赵霞.临床检验实验分析前的质量控制[J].检验医学与临床,2007,4(2):148-149. 被引量:23
  • 4Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines Use of Tumor Markers in Clinical Practice:QualityRequirements Edited by Catharine M[J].Sturgeon and Eleftherios Diamandis.
  • 5Loi S,Haydon AM,Shapiro J,et al.Towards evidence-based use of serum tumour marker requests:an audit of use in a tertiary hospital[J].Intern Med J,2004,34(6):545-550.
  • 6Roddam AW,Price CP,Allen NE,et al.Assessing the clinical impact of prostate-specific antigen assay variability and nonequimolarity:a simulation study based on the population of the United Kingdom[J].Clin Chem,2004,50(6):1012-1016.
  • 7Sturgeon C,Ellis A,Al-Sadie R.Annual Review for 2007.www.ukneqas.org.uk(Accessed 28th July,2008).
  • 8White P.Annual Review for PSA.http://www.immqas.org.uk/(Accessed 28th July,2008).
  • 9Kort SA,Martens F,Vanpoucke H,et al.Comparison of 6 automated assays for total and free prostate-specific antigen with special reference to their reactivity toward the WHO 96/670 reference preparation[J].Clin Chem,2006,52(9):1568-1574.
  • 10Stephan C,Klaas M,Muller C,et al.Interchangeability of measurements of total and free prostatespecific antigen in serum with 5 frequently used assay combinations:an update[J].Clin Chem,2006,52(28):59-64.

共引文献311

同被引文献61

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部