期刊文献+

世界教育发达国家初级中学教材评价标准探析及对我国的启示

An Analysis of the Evaluation Criteria of Teaching Materials in Junior High Schools in the Developed Countries in the World and Its Enlightenment to China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 教材评价标准引导教材质量与教学效果的提升,并使教材的研制与开发、编写与出版、发行与选用得以衡量与反思,进而使教材更能适应教学的需要与学习者的能力水准。综合发达国家中学教材的研究概况与启示,紧随现今核心素养的教育思潮,教材定位为科学的集合、学习者与外界互动探究的主要媒介、教育教学的支持性工具,提出对于教材评价标准的设计应从以下六个维度入手:价值与思想文化、知识、逻辑结构与心理发展、内容适切性、编写与设计、时代发展。在六个评价维度的基础上,结合初级中学数学的学科特点与现用教材,设计初级中学数学教材评价标准的理论框架。 Teaching material evaluation standard guides the improvement of teaching material quality and teaching effect,and makes the research and development,compilation and publication,distribution and selection of teaching materials be measured and reflected,so that the teaching materials can better adapt to the needs of teaching and the ability level of learners.The paper has reviewed the progress in the study of middle school teaching material in the developed countries and enlightenment,in the wake of the core literacy education thoughts,and teaching material as a collection of science,the main media of the learners to interact with the outside world as well as the supporting tool of education teaching.The evaluation standard of the teaching material has been put forward from six dimen⁃sions:value and ideological culture,knowledge,logical structure And psychological development,content relevance,composition and design and the development of era.On the basis of six evaluation dimensions,combining the subject characteristics of junior middle school mathematics and the current teaching materials,the theoretical framework of the evaluation standard of junior high school mathe⁃matics teaching materials is designed.
作者 刘卫娜 胡少明 LIU Wei-na;HU Shao-ming(School of Education,Baoji University of Arts and Sciences,Baoji 721013,China)
出处 《陕西学前师范学院学报》 2021年第4期121-127,共7页 Journal of Shaanxi Xueqian Normal University
基金 宝鸡文理学院研究生创新科研项目(YJSCX20YB26)。
关键词 初级中学 教材 评价标准 junior high school teaching materials evaluation standard
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献47

  • 1戴斌荣.定量与定性结合——心理学研究方法的发展趋势[J].盐城师范学院学报(人文社会科学版),2005,25(1):119-124. 被引量:16
  • 2高凌飚.教材评价维度与标准[J].教育发展研究,2007,27(06B):8-12. 被引量:92
  • 3秦金亮.心理学研究方法的新趋向-质化研究方法述评.山西师大学报:社会科学版,2000,(3):27-16,11.
  • 4Julian V H, Linda D H. Accountability Taxas--Style: The progress and learning of a urban minority students in a High--stakes testing context[J]. Washington: Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,2008,30(2) :75--85.
  • 5Goldenberg C, Gallimore R G, Reese L. Using mixed methods to explore latino children's literacy development: mixed methods in the study of childhood and family life[J]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press,2005, 21-46.
  • 6Megan O, Thomas C, John B. Teachers' perceptions of students with speech sound disorders: A quantitative and qualitative analysis [ J ]. Washington : Language, Speech & Hearing Services in Schools,2007,38(4) :327--342.
  • 7Hirokazu Y,Thomas S W, Ariel K, Niobe W. Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Research in Developmental Science: Uses and Methodological Choices[J]. New York:Developmental Psychology,2008,44(2) :344--354.
  • 8Robert M C, Bruce T. The educational researcher defined: what will future researchers he trained to do? [J] . Bloomington:The Journal Of Educational Research,2008,101(4):247--255.
  • 9刘常华.俄罗斯教科书制度概观[J].课程.教材.教法,2007,27(10):93-96. 被引量:6
  • 10United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Georg Eckert Institute for International Textbook Research. UNESCO Guidebook on Textbook Research and Textbook Revision (2nd revisedand updated edition) [M]. Pairs: Poppdruck D-30851Langenhagen, 2010: 7-18.

共引文献120

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部