期刊文献+

动物防疫类案件非诉执行程序要点解析 被引量:1

Analysis on the Key Points of Non-judicial Procedure for the Cases Concerning Animal Disease Prevention
下载PDF
导出
摘要 农业综合行政执法机构作为动物防疫违法行为的处罚机关,在遇到当事人拒不履行罚没款缴纳义务时,应当依法申请人民法院强制执行。本文按照时间顺序重现了一起动物防疫行政处罚案件从申请到人民法院强制执行完毕的全部流程,详述了案卷整理、催告程序、申请非诉裁定、行政裁定告知、申请非诉执行和执行结案等操作步骤,并分析了可能出现的问题和补救程序,以期为今后农业综合行政执法人员申请人民法院强制执行提供思路。 As the authorities for punishing illegal behaviors in non-compliance with animal diseases prevention,agricultural comprehensive administrative law enforcement institutions shall,when some parties concerned refuse to perform their obligation of agreeing confiscation and paying fine,apply to the people's court for compulsory execution according to laws.In the paper,the whole process of a case of administrative penalty concerning animal disease prevention from application to the end of compulsory execution by people's court was reviewed in chronological order,the procedures of file arrangement,summon exhortation,application for non-judicial adjudication,notification of administrative adjudication,application for non-judicial execution,as well as compulsory execution and case finalization,were described,and any possible problems and remedial procedures were analyzed,hoping to provide reference and experience for agricultural comprehensive administrative law enforcement personnel who might apply to people's court for compulsory execution in the future.
作者 周子涵 Zhou Zihan(Qingdao Agricultural Administrative Law Enforcement Detachment,Qingdao,Shandong 266071,China)
出处 《中国动物检疫》 CAS 2021年第5期58-60,共3页 China Animal Health Inspection
关键词 动物防疫 行政处罚 行政强制 监督执法 animal disease prevention administrative punishment administrative enforcement supervision and law enforcement
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献21

  • 1[德]Peter Gilles.《德国民事诉讼程序电子化及其合法化与“E-民事诉讼法”之特殊规则》,张陈果译,载《民事程序法研究(第三辑)》,厦门大学出版社2007年版,第316页.
  • 2[意]莫诺·卡佩莱蒂等.《当事人基本程序保障权与未来的民事诉讼》,徐昕译,法律出版社,2000年版,第60—65页.
  • 3徐昕:《信息时代的民事诉讼:一个比较法的视角》,《司法改革评论》第2辑,中国法制出版社2002年版.
  • 4[德]PeterGilles:《德国民事诉讼程序电子化及其合法化与"E-民事诉讼法"之特殊规则》,张陈果译,《民事程序法研究》第3辑.厦门大学出版社2007年版.
  • 5[德]赫尔默特·赫里斯曼、[南非]沃特·德·沃斯:《信息社会的挑战:现代科技在民事诉讼等程序中的运用》,载《当事人基本程序保障权与未来的民事诉讼》,徐昕译,法律出版社2000年版,第178-185页.
  • 6Bills v. Kennecott Corp. 108F. R. D. 459,462 (D. Utah 1985 ).
  • 7Mikl6s Kengyel, Zolt6n Nemess6nyi Editors. Electronic Technology and Civil Procedure--New Paths to Justice from Around the World, Springer. 2012 . Pp. 33 -35.
  • 8[英]理查德·萨斯坎德:《法律人的明天会怎样?--法律职业的未来》,何广越译,北京大学出版社2015年版,第111-112页.
  • 9Mik16s Kengyel, Zoltan Nemessnyi Editors. Electronic Technology and Civil Procedure--New Paths to Justice from Around the World, Springer. 2012. PId2.
  • 10新加坡电子诉讼的网站:https://www.elitigation.sg/_layouts/IELS/Home/AboutElit.aspx,2016年5月1日访问.

共引文献53

同被引文献2

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部