“司法为民”理念的重申与司法官僚集团的响应——对正当防卫认定标准把握变化的另一种理解

The Reaffirmation of the Idea of“Justice for the people”and the Response of Judicial Bureaucrats--Another Understanding of the Change in the Cognizance Standard of Justifiable Defense

在正当防卫的认定标准把握上,于海明正当防卫案后,实务领域在对具体案件的处理中,呈现出对正当防卫的认定标准把握相对宽松的倾向。除解释为背后的结果导向思维向行为导向思维的转变,亦可解释为原本专注自身利益的司法官僚集团对“人民司法为人民”的党的司法理念的又一次热烈响应。经由诸多案中对人民群众呼声的广泛听取,在自上而下近似指令式地完成了重申后,再次获得了群众的认同与支持。借此,司法官僚集团调整了之前对自身利益的狭隘认识,将司法的社会效果摆在更为重要的位置。

After the case of Yu Haiming’s justifi able defense,there is,based on following the standard of justifi able defense,a tendency of taking relatively loose cognizance standard of self-defense in the practical fi eld.This phenomenon can be interpreted as the potential change from the resultoriented thinking to the behavior-oriented thinking,or as another warm response to the party’s judicial concept of“people’s justice for the people”for the judicial bureaucrat group focusing on their own interests.Through extensive listening to the voice of the people in many cases,the concept was again recognized and supported by the masses after the reiteration was completed from top to bottom as a seemingly instruction.In this way,the judicial bureaucrats can adjust their narrow understanding of their own interests and put the social effect of justice in a more important position.