期刊文献+

失范鉴定人将面临的三份监管“黑名单” 被引量:1

Three regulatory “blacklists” for anomie appraisers
原文传递
导出
摘要 鉴定意见是重要的诉讼证据,是法官发现事实真相的得力助手,但失范鉴定意见则起着相反的作用。近期全国人大常委会、最高人民法院、国家市场监督管理总局分别发文,对鉴定主体展开信用管理,对于存在失信失范行为的鉴定主体,纳入黑名单进行管理,需引起鉴定机构和鉴定人的重视。 Forensic expert testimony is an important litigation evidence and a right-hand assistant for the judge to discover the truth, but anomie expert testimony plays the opposite role. Recently, the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress, the Supreme People’s Court and the State Administration for Market Regulation have issued documents respectively to carry out credit management on the forensic experts. For those forensic experts with dishonest and anomie behaviors, they should be blacklisted for management, which needs the attention of the appraisal institutions and appraisers.
作者 刘鑫 Liu Xin(Collaborative Innovation Center of Judicial Civilization,Beijing.100088;Key Laboratory for Evidence Science(China University of Political Science and Law),Ministry ofEducation,Beijing,100088;Center for Health and Pharmaceutical Law and Ethics of China University of PoliticalScience and Law(CUPL),Beijing,100088)
出处 《中国法医学杂志》 CSCD 2021年第2期121-123,共3页 Chinese Journal of Forensic Medicine
基金 国家社会科学基金重点研究项目“医患关系视角下我国医事行为的伦理思考及法律规制研究”(15AZD065) 中国工程院重点咨询研究项目(2019-XZ-31)。
关键词 失范鉴定活动 鉴定机构 鉴定人 鉴定意见 黑名单 Anomie appraisal activity Appraisal institution Forensic expert witness Expert testimony Blacklist
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献43

共引文献64

同被引文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部