期刊文献+

针刺治疗卒中后抑郁的疗效及安全性系统评价 被引量:7

Systematic Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Acupuncture in Treatment of Poststroke Depression
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:系统评价针刺治疗卒中后抑郁的临床疗效及安全性。方法:检索中国知网、万方数据库等中文数据库以及PubMed、Cochrane图书馆临床对照试验注册库等英文数据库,全面收集自建库以来至2018年5月针刺治疗中风后抑郁的随机对照试验,按照纳入和排除标准筛选高质量文献,提取有效数据。运用RevMan5.3软件对纳入的文献进行异质性检验,并进一步对治疗后针刺组与药物组的临床总有效率、汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)评分等结局指标进行Meta分析。结果:最终纳入8篇文献,包含769例患者。Meta分析结果显示,与单纯氟西汀治疗比较,针刺及针刺联合其他疗法治疗PSD能提高临床总有效率(RR=1.08,95%CI[1.01,1.16]),降低HAMD评分(MD=-1.15,95%CI[-1.97,-0.32])、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)水平(MD=-1.78,95%CI[-2.93,-0.64])、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)水平(MD=-9.53,95%CI[-18.10,-0.96])及不良反应发生率(RR=0.16,95%CI[0.07,0.35])。结论:与氟西汀比较,针刺治疗卒中后抑郁具有较高的临床疗效,且在改善患者症状、减轻不良反应等方面具有显著优势。但因纳入文献数量较少、方法学质量不高,上述结论尚需更多高质量研究予以验证。 Objective:To systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of acupuncture in the treatment of poststroke depression(PSD).Methods:Randomized controlled trials of acupuncture in the treatment of PSD were retrieved from Chinese databases such as Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI),Wanfang database,etc.and English databases such as PubMed,Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials,etc.The time limit was from the building date of the datebase to May,2018.Literatures of high quality were screened according to inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria,and valid data were extracted.RevMan 5.3 software was used to test the heterogeneity of the included literatures,and further meta-analysis was conducted on the clinical total effective rate,Hamilton Depression Scale(HAMD)score,and other outcome indicators of the acupuncture group and the drug group after treatment.Results:A total of 8 studies with 769 patients were finally included.The results of Meta-analysis showed that compared with treatments by using fluoxetine alone,acupuncture and acupuncture combined with other therapy in the treatment of PSD could increase the clinial total effective rate(RR=1.08,95%CI[1.01,1.16]),decrease the HAMD score(MD=-1.15,95%CI[-1.97,-0.32]),IL-6 level(MD=-1.78,95%CI[-2.93,-0.64]),TNF-αlevel(MD=-9.53,95%CI[-18.10,-0.96]),and the incidence of adverse reactions(RR=0.16,95%CI[0.07,0.35]).Conclusions:Compared with fluoxetine,acupuncture has a higher clinical efficacy in the treatment of PSD,and has significant advantages in improving the symptoms of patients and reducing adverse reactions.However,due to the small number and low methodological quality of the included literatures,the above conclusions need to be verified by more high-quality studies.
作者 王依倩 袁春雨 焦洋 李纪新 黄海量 WANG Yiqian;YUAN Chunyu;JIAO Yang;LI Jixin;HUANG Hailiang(College of Rehabilitation Medicine,Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Jinan 250355,China)
出处 《山东中医杂志》 2021年第5期464-470,共7页 Shandong Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
基金 山东省中医药科技发展计划项目(编号:2017-018,2015-030) 山东中医药大学2019年省级大学生创新创业训练计划项目(编号:S201910441034) 山东省名老中医药专家传承工作室建设项目(批文号:鲁卫中发展字〔2018〕1号)。
关键词 针刺 卒中后抑郁 随机对照试验 系统评价 总有效率 汉密尔顿抑郁量表评分 不良反应 acupuncture post-stroke depression randomized controlled trials systematic evaluation total effective rate Hamilton Depression Scale score adverse reactions
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献118

共引文献38070

同被引文献98

引证文献7

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部