期刊文献+

相似度三支决策模糊粗糙集模型的决策代价研究 被引量:2

Decision costs of the similarity three-way decision-theoretic fuzzy rough set model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在三支决策模糊粗糙集模型中,一些学者基于相似度三支决策模糊粗糙集模型建立了目标函数来得到最优阈值对(α,β,)的计算方法,但在该过程的研究中,学者并没有在相似度三支决策模糊粗糙集模型中讨论关于决策代价的描述问题。基于模糊信息系统用新的函数来描述决策代价成为计算阈值对(α,β,)的一种方法,首先,在模糊信息系统中,通过建立一个描述决策代价的函数,将模糊信息系统中的模糊数与三支决策的决策代价联系在一起;然后对隶属频率进行拟合,得到了三支决策中决策代价的数值描述;最后,通过两个实例说明了该方法的可行性和适用性。 In the three-way decision-theoretic fuzzy rough set model,several scholars established the objective function based on the similarity three-way decision-theoretic fuzzy rough set model to derive the method for calculating the optimal threshold pair(α,β).However,during this research,the authors did not discuss the description of the decision costs in the similarity three-way decision-theoretic fuzzy rough set model.The new function describing the decision costs is used in the method for calculating the threshold pair(α,β)based on the fuzzy information system.First,in the fuzzy information system,the fuzzy number is associated with the decision costs of three-way decisions by establishing a function describing the decision costs.Then,the numerical description of the decision costs of three-way decisions is obtained by fitting the membership frequency.Finally,two examples are given to illustrate the feasibility and applicability of the method.
作者 曾婷 唐孝 谭阳 丁本香 ZENG Ting;TANG Xiao;TAN Yang;DING Benxiang(School of Mathematical Science,Sichuan Normal University,Chengdu 610066,China;Institute of Intelligent Information and Quantum Information,Sichuan Normal University,Chengdu 610066,China)
出处 《智能系统学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2020年第6期1068-1078,共11页 CAAI Transactions on Intelligent Systems
基金 四川省科技计划资助项目(2019YJ0529) 四川省教育厅重点项目(18ZA0410).
关键词 三支决策 模糊粗糙集 决策代价 模糊数 阈值对 属性值 区间值 多重集 three-way decisions fuzzy rough set decision costs fuzzy number threshold pair attribute value interval value multiset
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献23

  • 1Pawlak Z.Rough sets[J].International Journal of Computer and Information Science,1982,11(5):341-356.
  • 2Pawlak Z.Rough Sets:Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Data[M].Boston:Kluwer Academic Publishers Press,1991:90-166.
  • 3Yao Y Y.Three-way decision:an interpretation of rules in rough set theory[J].LNAI,2009(5589):642-649.
  • 4Yao Y Y.Three-way decisions with probabilistic rough sets[J].Information Sciences,2010,180:341-353.
  • 5Yao Y.The superiority of three-way decisions in probabilistic rough set models[J].Information Sciences,2011,181 (6):1080-1096.
  • 6Pawlak Z,Wong S K M,Ziarko W.Rough sets:probabilistic versus deterministic approach[J].Inter.Journal of Man-Machine Studies,1988,29:81-95.
  • 7Yao Y Y,Wong S K M.A decision theoretic framework for approximation concepts[J].Inter.Journal of Man-machine Studies,1992,37:793-809.
  • 8Yao Y Y,Wong S K M.A decision theoretic framework for approximating concepts[J].International Journal of Man-machine Studies,1992,37(6):793-809.
  • 9Ziarko W.Variable precision rough set model[J].Journal of computer and system sciences,1993,46(1):39-59.
  • 10Slezak D.Rough sets and Bayes factor[J].LNCS Transactions on Rough Sets,2005,111:202-229.

共引文献16

同被引文献30

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部