《论语》“四十而不惑”章是伪作吗

Is the Chapter“Forty without Confusion”in Analects a fake

与李振宏教授的论文《〈论语〉“四十而不惑,五十而知天命”章是伪作》进行商榷,认为:李先生怀疑“吾十有五而志于学”的关键证据有误;对“三十而立”的评价标准设定过高;对“四十而不惑”“五十而知天命”“六十而耳顺”“七十而从心所欲不逾矩”的评价标准,是要求孔子的言行跟历史发展结果相一致,有事后诸葛亮之嫌,而且没有注意到该结果是法家所导致的,不会得到孔子的赞同;没有注意到孔子说的惑与不惑,判断标准应是孔子内心的想法,而不是他人的标准;李先生将“六十而耳顺”解释为“不动怒”“不介意”,尤为错误,这就要求孔子藏污纳垢,包容所有的假恶丑,跟《论语》中热爱真善美、憎恶假恶丑的孔子形象完全相反。

After discussing with Professor Li Zhenhong about his paper The Analects of Confucius, the chapter of forty without confusion, fifty knowing destiny is a fake work, it is believed that Mr. Li suspects that the key evidence of When I was fifteen, I want to learn is wrong, the evaluation standard of standing at thirty is too high, the evaluation criteria of forty without confusion, fifty knowing destiny, sixty without obeying and seventy following one’ s will without exceeding the moment require Confucius’ words and deeds to be consistent with the results of historical development, which is suspected of being wise after the event, and does not notice that the results are caused by Legalists and will not be approved by Confucius;Respectfully, he does not notice that Confucius said that the judgment standard of confusion and no confusion should be Confucius’ inner understanding, not others’ standards;Mr. Li’s interpretation of sixty without obeying is interpreted as"do not angry" and "do not mind" is particularly wrong, which requires Confucius to hide filth and embrace all falsehood, darkness and ugliness,which is completely opposite to the image of Confucius who loves truth,goodness and beauty and hates falsehood, darkness and ugliness in The Analects of Confucius.