期刊文献+

内括约肌切除术治疗低位直肠癌手术难度的影响因素分析 被引量:2

Factors influencing the surgical difficulty of intershphincteric resection for low rectal cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨内括约肌切除术(ISR)治疗低位直肠癌手术难度的影响因素,并初步建立预测模型。方法回顾性分析2016年1月至2020年11月武汉大学中南医院收治的100例行ISR手术的低位直肠癌患者的临床信息及影像学资料,根据患者的临床信息建立ISR手术难度的评分标准,将患者分为容易组和困难组,进行单因素分析和多因素Logistic回归分析ISR手术难度的影响因素,并建立预测模型,用受试者工作特征曲线验证其效能。结果根据手术难度评分标准,78例患者归为手术容易组,22例患者归为困难组。单因素分析表明,肥胖(χ^(2)=4.549,P<0.05)、肿瘤距肛缘距离[(4.49±0.55)cm比(4.40±0.62)cm,t=3.525,P<0.01]、新辅助放化疗(χ^(2)=4.948,P<0.05)、直肠系膜脂肪面积[(18.10±5.30)cm^(2)比(22.38±6.18)cm^(2),t=-3.220,P<0.01]、坐骨结节间距[(11.48±1.39)cm比(10.17±0.84)cm,t=5.497,P<0.01]、骨盆β角[(43.25±6.48)°比(46.50±5.90)°,t=-2.116,P<0.05]是ISR手术困难的影响因素,多因素Logistic回归分析提示肥胖[比值比(OR)=11.935,P<0.05]、新辅助放化疗(OR=11.464,P<0.05)、直肠系膜脂肪面积(OR=1.189,P<0.05)、坐骨结节间距(OR=0.358,P<0.05)是ISR手术难度的独立预测因素。结论肥胖(体质指数≥28 kg/m^(2))、新辅助放化疗、直肠系膜脂肪面积≥21.90 cm^(2)、坐骨结节间距≤10.29 cm的患者行ISR手术难度较大。 Objective To investigate the factors influencing the operative difficulty of intershphincteric resection(ISR)in the treatment of low rectal cancer,and to establish a prediction model.Methods The clinical information and imaging data of 100 patients with low rectal cancer undergoing ISR surgery admitted to Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University from January 2016 to November 2020 were retrospectively analyzed.According to the clinical information of the patients,the scoring standard of ISR operation difficulty was established,dividing the patients into easy group and difficult group.Single factor analysis and multivariable logistic regression analysis were used to pick out the influence factors of ISR operation difficulty,and a prediction model was established.Receiver operating characteristic curve was used to verify the effectiveness of the prediction model.Results According to the scoring standard of operation difficulty,78 patients were classified as easy group and 22 patients as difficult group.Single factor analysis showed that obesity(χ^(2)=4.549,P<0.05),distance of tumor from anal margin[(4.49±0.55)cm vs.(4.40±0.62)cm,t=3.525,P<0.01],neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy(χ^(2)=4.948,P<0.05),mesorectal fat area[(18.10±5.30)cm^(2) vs.(22.38±6.18)cm^(2),t=-3.220,P<0.01],the intertuberous distance[(11.48±1.39)cm vs.(10.17±0.84)cm,t=5.497,P<0.01]and the pelvic angle β[(43.25±6.48)°vs.(46.50±5.90)°,t=-2.116,P<0.05]were the influential factors for the surgical difficulty of ISR,multivariate logistic regression analysis suggested that obesity[odds ratio(OR=11.935,95% confidence interval(CI):2.411-63.577,P<0.05)],neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy(OR=11.646,95%CI:1.648-79.760,P<0.05),mesorectal fat area(OR=1.189,95%CI:1.015-1.393,P<0.05)and intertuberous distance(OR=0.358,95%CI:0.135-0.949,P<0.05)were the independent risk factors for surgical difficulty of ISR.Conclusion Preoperative comprehensive evaluation of clinical data and pelvic factors in patients with low rectal cancer can predict the surgical difficulty of ISR,which is helpful to determine an appropriate surgical approach before surgery and reduce complications.
作者 刘波 陈保祥 洪云天 孙孔亮 钟鑫坚 任相海 喻学桥 江从庆 钱群 Liu Bo;Chen Baoxiang;Hong Yuntian;Sun Kongliang;Zhong Xinjian;Ren Xianghai;Yu Xueqiao;Jiang Congqing;Qian Qun(Department of Colorectal and Anal Surgery of Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University,Clinical Center of Intestinal and Colorectal Diseases of Hubei Province,Hubei Key Laboratory of Intestinal and Colorectal Diseases(Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University),Colorectal and Anal Disease Research Center of Medical School(Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University),Quality Control Center of Colorectal and Anal Surgery of Health Commission of Hubei Province,Wuhan 430071,China)
出处 《中华实验外科杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2021年第4期721-725,共5页 Chinese Journal of Experimental Surgery
基金 武汉大学中南医院创新培育基金(znpy2019086)。
关键词 直肠癌 手术 ectal cancer Surgery
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献21

  • 1Rovers MM,Schilder AG,Zielhuis GA,Rosenfeld RM,张江平,杨妙丽,张全安.中耳炎[J].国外医学(耳鼻咽喉科学分册),2005,29(3):141-143. 被引量:433
  • 2顾东风,Reynolds K,杨文杰,陈恕凤,吴锡桂,段秀芳,蒲晓东,徐丽华,吴先萍,陈祥福,魏仁敏,陈娜萦,吴天一,王礼桂,姚才良,牟建军,马义峰,王晓飞,Whelton P,何江.中国成年人代谢综合征的患病率[J].中华糖尿病杂志(1006-6187),2005,13(3):181-186. 被引量:580
  • 3Lenhard M, Johnson T, Weckbach S, et al. Three-dimensional pelvimetry by computed tomography. Radiol Med, 2009,114 (5) :827-834.
  • 4Keller TM, Rake A, Michel SC, et al. Obstetric MR pelvimetry: reference values and evaluation of inter- and intraobserver error and intraindividual variability. Radiology. 2003,227( 1 ) :37-43.
  • 5Anderson N, Humphries N, Wells JE. Measurement error in computed tomography pelvimetry. Australas Radiol, 2005,49 (2) : 104-107.
  • 6Heald RJ. Total mesorectal excision is optimal surgery for rectal cancer: a Scandinavian consensus. Br J Surg, 1995,82 (10): 1297-1299.
  • 7Baik SH, Kim NK, Lee KY, et ah Factors influencing pathologic results after total mesorectal excision for tectal cancer: analysis of consecutive 100 cases. Ann Surg Oncol, 2008,15(3) :721-728.
  • 8Killeen T, Banerjee S, Vijay V, et al. Magnetic resonance (MR) pelvimetry as a predictor of difficulty in laparoscopic operations for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc, 2010,24(12) :2974-2979.
  • 9Boyle KM, Petty D, Chalmers AG, et al. MRI assessment of the bony pelvis may help predict resectability of rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis, 2005,7 ( 3 ) : 232-240.
  • 10Salerno G, Daniels IR, Brown G, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging pelvimetry in 186 patients with rectal cancer confirms an overlap in pelvic size between males and females. Colorectal Dis, 2006,8(9) : 772-776.

共引文献378

同被引文献10

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部