期刊文献+

结直肠癌患者手术切口感染危险因素的Meta分析 被引量:11

Risk Factors for Surgical Incision Infection in Patients with Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的通过Meta分析探讨结直肠癌患者手术切口感染的危险因素,为制定预防措施提供参考依据。方法计算机检索中国知网、中国生物医学文献数据库、万方数据库、维普数据库、The Cochrane Library、PubMed、Embase、Web of Science数据库,收集关于结直肠癌手术切口感染危险因素的病例对照研究和队列研究。由2名研究者根据纳入与排除标准进行文献筛选,并运用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(Newcastle-Ottawa Scale,NOS)对纳入文献进行质量评价。结果最终纳入17篇文献,累计结肠癌患者16 992例。Meta分析结果显示糖尿病(OR=1.65,95%CI:1.48~1.84)、手术时间≥3 h(OR=1.41,95%CI:1.22~1.63)、体质量指数(Body Mass Index, BMI)≧30 kg/m^(2)(OR=1.35,95%CI:1.18~1.55)、开腹手术(OR=1.60,95%CI:1.23~2.07)、手术方式(OR=1.69,95%CI:1.38~2.08)、肿瘤分期(OR=1.42,95%CI:1.28~1.58)、年龄(OR=1.28,95%CI:1.12~1.47)为结直肠癌患者手术切口感染的危险因素。敏感性分析与发表偏倚结果显示各因素合并结果比较稳定,发表偏倚不明显。结论对结直肠癌患者基础疾病、手术时间、体质量、手术方式、肿瘤分期及年龄等进行管理可有效降低手术切口感染的发生率。 Objective To clarify the risk factors of surgical incision infection in patients with colorectal cancer through meta-analysis,and to provide reference for preventive measures.Methods Case-control studies and cohort studies on risk factors of surgical incision infection in patients with colorectal cancer were searched in databases including CNKI,China Biomedical Literature Database,Wanfang Database,Weipu Database,The Cochrane Library,PubMed,Embase,and Web of Science.Two researchers screened the literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria,and evaluated the quality of the included literature by Newcastle-Ottawa Scale(NOS).RevMan5.3 was used to perform statistical analysis.Results Seventeen articles were finally included,with a total of 16,992 cases of colon cancer,and 8 risk factors.Meta-analysis showed that diabetes(OR=1.65,95%CI:1.48~1.84),operation time(OR=1.41,95%CI:1.22~1.63),BMI(OR=1.35,95%CI:1.18~1.55),open surgery(OR=1.60,95%CI:1.23~2.07),surgical method(OR=1.69,95%CI:1.38~2.08),tumor stage(OR=1.42,95%CI:1.28~1.58),and age(OR=1.28,95%CI:1.12~1.47)were risk factors for surgical incision infection in patients with colorectal cancer.Sensitivity analysis and publication bias results show that the combined results of all factors were relatively stable,and no obvious publication bias was found.Conclusion Effective management for basic disease,operation time,weight,open surgery,operation method,tumor stage and age can effectively reduce the incidence of surgical incision infection.
作者 胡正中 廖园园 周毅峰 彭瑨 秦月兰 HU Zheng-zhong;LIAO Yuan-yuan;ZHOU Yi-feng;PENG Jin;QIN Yue-lan(Hunan Provincial People’s Hospital,the First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University,Changsha 410005,China)
出处 《护理学报》 北大核心 2021年第8期23-27,共5页 Journal of Nursing(China)
基金 湖南省卫生健康委员会指导项目(20200632)。
关键词 结直肠癌 手术切口 感染 META分析 colorectal cancer surgical incision infection Meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

二级参考文献150

  • 1李福莲,张克伟,菅福琴,梅逸静,师建成,王世浩.大肠癌患者医院感染危险因素流行病学调查分析[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志,2006,13(17):1293-1294. 被引量:7
  • 2Yamamoto S,Fu jita S,Akasu T,et al. Wound infection after elective laparoscopic surgery for colorectal carcinoma [J]. Surg Endosc, 2007,21(12) : 2248-2252.
  • 3Aimaq R, Akopian G, Kaufman HS. Surgical site infection rates in laparoscopic versus open eolorectal surgery[J]. Am Surg,2011,77(10):1290-1294.
  • 4Burke JP.Infection control-aproblem for patient safety[J].N Engl J Med,2003,348:651-656.
  • 5Guillou PJ,Quirke P,Thorpe H,et al.Short-term endpoints of conventionalversus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer(MRCCLASICC trial):multicentre,randomised controlled trial[J].Lancet,2005,365:1718-1726.
  • 6Celkan MA,Ustunsoy H,Daglar B,et al.Readmission and mortality in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery with fast-track recovery protocol[J].Heart Vessels,2005,20(6):251-255.
  • 7A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for coloncancer[J].N Engl J Med,2004,350:2050-2059.
  • 8Poon JT,Law WL,Wong IW,et al.Impact of laparoscopic colorectal resection on surgical site infection[J].Annals of Surgery,2009,249:77-81.
  • 9Richards C,Edwards J,Culver D,et al.Does using a laparoscopic approachto cholecystectomy decrease the risk of surgical site infection[J].Ann Surg,2003,237:358-362.
  • 10Ortega G,Rhee DS,Papandria DJ,et al.An evaluation of surgical site infections by wound classification system using the ACS-NSQIP[J].J Surg Res,2012,174(1):33-38.

共引文献332

同被引文献139

引证文献11

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部