期刊文献+

探索二甲双胍减少系统性红斑狼疮患者感染事件的作用:一项Met-Lupus研究的事后分析 被引量:1

Effect of metformin on infection event reduction in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus:a post-hoc analysis of a Met-Lupus Trial
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的·在一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照临床研究(Met-Lupus)的基础上探索二甲双胍对中/低疾病活动度系统性红斑狼疮(systemic lupus erythematosus,SLE)患者的感染防护作用。方法·Met-Lupus研究的140例受试者被随机分为二甲双胍组(67例)和安慰剂组(73例),分别在常规治疗的基础上加入二甲双胍或安慰剂;二甲双胍目标剂量为1500 mg/d,分3次口服。记录12个月随访期内SLE患者感染事件的发生情况,包括感染事件的类型、感染持续时间、感染严重程度,以及发生感染时实验室检查结果;比较发生和未发生感染事件受试者的临床特征,以及比较发生感染的患者中使用二甲双胍和使用安慰剂患者的临床特征。多元Logistic回归分析二甲双胍与感染事件发生的相关性,生存分析比较二甲双胍组和安慰剂组患者的无感染生存时间。结果·在12个月随访期末,未发生感染事件受试者的二甲双胍使用率(65.9%)显著高于发生感染事件的受试者(34.7%),差异有统计学意义(P=0.022),其他基线临床特征及治疗方案在感染和非感染患者间差异均无统计学意义。多元Logistic回归分析显示,二甲双胍的使用是减少SLE患者感染的独立保护因素(OR=0.423,P=0.033)。感染患者中,二甲双胍组的严重感染率较安慰剂组更低,但差异无统计学意义(5.9%vs 12.5%,P=0.466)。进一步分析显示,二甲双胍组受试者的感染持续时间[7.0(6.0,11.8)d]显著短于安慰剂组[10.0(7.0,21.8)d],差异有统计学意义(P=0.034);同时,二甲双胍组受试者C反应蛋白水平[2.5(2.4,6.4)mg/L]也呈现低于安慰剂组[4.5(2.5,8.9)mg/L]的趋势,但差异无统计学意义(P=0.075)。生存分析表明,二甲双胍受试者的无感染生存时间较安慰剂组显著延长(HR=0.527,95%CI 0.294~0.945,P=0.036)。结论·二甲双胍对轻/中度SLE患者可能具有潜在的减少感染事件的作用。 Objective·To evaluate the effect of metformin on reducing infection events in the systemic lupus erythematosus(SLE)patients with moderate/low disease activity based on a multicenter,randomized,double-blind,placebo-controlled clinical study(Met-Lupus Trial).Methods·The 140 participants in the Met-Lupus Trial were randomly divided into the metformin group(67 cases)and the placebo group(73 cases).The metformin tablets or placebo tablets were added to their standard therapy with target dose of 1500 mg/d,three times per day.The infection events during the 12 months’follow-up of the patients were recorded,including the types of infection events,infection duration,infection severity,and laboratory results during infection.The clinical characteristics between the patients with or without infection as well as between the infected patients treated with metformin or placebo were compared.Multivariate Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the correlation between metformin and infection events,and survival analysis was used to compare the infection-free survival time between the metformin group and the placebo group.Results·By 12 months of follow-up,the exposure rate of metformin in the patients without infection(65.9%)was significantly higher than that in the patients with infection(34.7%,P=0.022),while other clinical parameters were comparable.Multivariate Logistic regression analysis suggested that the use of metformin was an independent protective factor against infection in the SLE patients(OR=0.423,P=0.033).In the infected patients,the severe infection incidence in the metformin group was numerically lower than that in the placebo group,but there was no significant difference(5.9%vs 12.5%,P=0.466).Further analysis showed that the infection duration[7.0(6.0,11.8)d]of the metformin group was significantly lower than that of the placebo group[10.0(7.0,21.8)d](P=0.034);meanwhile,the C-reactive protein in the metformin group[2.5(2.4,6.4)mg/L]was also lower than that in the placebo group[4.5(2.5,8.9)mg/L]without significant difference(P=0.075).Survival analysis showed that infection-free survival of the metformin group was significantly longer than that of the placebo group(HR=0.527,95%CI 0.294-0.945,P=0.036).Conclusion·Metformin may have a potential effect on infection event reduction in the SLE patients with moderate/low disease activity.
作者 耿时凯 张乐 王慧静 吕良敬 万伟国 孙芳芳 叶霜 GENG Shi-kai;ZHANG Le;WANG Hui-jing;LÜLiang-jing;WAN Wei-guo;SUN Fang-fang;YE Shuang(Department of Rheumatology,Renji Hospital South Campus,Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine,Shanghai 201112,China;Department of Pharmacy,Renji Hospital South Campus,Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine,Shanghai 201112,China;Department of Rheumatology,Renji Hospital,Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine,Shanghai 200001,China;Department of Rheumatology,Huashan Hospital,Fudan University Shanghai Medical College,Shanghai 200041,China)
出处 《上海交通大学学报(医学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2021年第4期473-478,共6页 Journal of Shanghai Jiao tong University:Medical Science
基金 国家重点研发计划(2016YFC0903902) 上海申康医院发展中心三年行动计划(16CR1013A) 国家自然科学基金青年项目(71804109) 上海市卫生和计划生育委员会科研课题青年项目(20174Y0040) 上海交通大学医学院附属仁济医院南院国自然青年培育项目(2017PYQA08)。
关键词 系统性红斑狼疮 二甲双胍 感染 随机对照研究 systemic lupus erythematosus(SLE) metformin infection randomized controlled study
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献20

  • 1Ganeshan K, Chawla A. Metabolic regulation of immune re- sponses[J]. Annu Rev Immunol, 2014, 32: 609-634. DOI: 10.
  • 2Andris F, Leo O. AMPK in lymphocyte metabolism and function [J]. Int Rev Immunol, 2015, 34(1): 67-81. DOI: 10.3109/0883 0185.2014.969422.
  • 3Zeng H, Chi H. mTOR and lymphocyte metabolism[J]. Curr Opin Immunol, 2013, 25(3): 347-355. DOI: 10.1016/j.coi.2013.05. 002.
  • 4Shadel GS, Horvath TL. Mitochondrial ROS signaling in or- ganismal homeostasis[J]. Cell, 2015, 163(3): 560-569. DOI: 10. 1016/j.cell.2015.10.001.
  • 5Mills E, O'Neill LA. Succinate: a metabolic signal in inilam- mation[J]. Trends Cell Biol, 2014, 24(5): 313-320. DOI: 10. 1016/j .tcb.2013.11.008.
  • 6Gut P, Verdin E. The nexus of chromatin regulation and in- termediary metabolism[J]. Nature, 2013, 502(7472): 489-498. DOI: 10.1038/nature12752.
  • 7Loftus RM, Finlay DK. Immunometabolism: cellular metabolism turns immune regulator[J]. J Biol Chem, 2016, 291(1): 1-10. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.R115.693903.
  • 8Pearce EL, Pearce EJ. Metabolic pathways in immune cell ac- ti-vation and quiescence[J]. Immunity, 2013, 38(4): 633-643. DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.04.005.
  • 9Yang Z, Matteson EL, Goronzy JJ, et al. T-cell metabolism in autoimmune disease[J]. Arthritis Res Ther, 2015, l 1 (17) : 29, DOI: 10.1186/s13075-015-0542-4.
  • 10Yin Y, Choi SC, Xu Z, et al. Normalization of CD4+T cell metabolism reverses lupus[J]. Sei Transl Med, 2015, 7(274): 274ra18. DOI: 10.1126/seitranslmed.aaa0835.

共引文献4

同被引文献8

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部