期刊文献+

临床路径应用于日间腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术的效果分析 被引量:6

Analysis of Application Effect of Clinical Pathway in Ambulatory Laparoscopic Surgery of Inguinal Hernia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的了解临床路径应用于日间腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术的效果。方法研究某院自2016年1月-2018年12月行腹腔镜腹股沟疝日间手术232例患者资料,随机分成临床路径组与非临床路径组,进行对比分析。结果随访时间6个月~35个月(中位时间18.6个月),随访率96.1%。两组患者术后4 h疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、术后下床时间、术后急性尿潴留发生率、术后2 w及4 w恢复非限制活动率比较无统计学差异(P>0.05);术后并发症比较无统计学差异(P>0.05),均无严重并发症发生。住院时间、住院总费用临床路径组低于非临床路径组,两组比较有统计学差异(P<0.05)。满意度评分临床路径组高于非临床路径组,两组比较有统计学差异(P<0.05)。结论临床路径应用于日间腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术具有缩短住院时间,降低医疗费用,提高患者满意度等优点,临床路径管理模式是开展日间手术的有力措施。 Objective To investigate the application effect of the clinical pathway in ambulatory laparoscopic surgery of inguinal hernia.Methods The data of 232 patients who underwent ambulatory laparoscopic surgery of inguinal hernia from January 2016 to December 2018 was studied.They were randomly divided into clinical pathway group and non-clinical pathway group for contrastive analysis.Results The follow-up time was 6 to 35 months(median time of 18.6 months),and the follow-up rate was 96.1%.There were no significant differences in postoperative VAS pain score 4 hours,postoperative time out of bed,incidence of postoperative acute urinary retention,and rate of recovery of unrestricted activity 2 and 4 weeks after surgery between the two groups(P>0.05).There was no statistical difference in postoperative complications(P>0.05),and no serious complications occurred.The length of stay and total cost of hospitalization in the clinical pathway group were lower than those in the non-clinical pathway group,and there were statistical differences between the two groups(P<0.05).The satisfaction score of the clinical pathway group was higher than that of the non-clinical pathway group,and there was a statistical difference between the two groups(P<0.05).Conclusion The clinical pathway applied to ambulatory laparoscopic surgery of inguinal hernia has the advantages of shortening the length of hospital stay,reducing medical costs,and improving patient satisfaction.Clinical pathway management model is a powerful measure to develop ambulatory surgery.
作者 陈德键 缪传文 黄陈 李群 钟力炜 CHEN Dejian;MIAO Chuanwen;HUANG Chen(Shanghai General Hospital,Shanghai Jiaotong University,Shanghai,200080,China;不详)
出处 《中国卫生质量管理》 2021年第4期8-11,共4页 Chinese Health Quality Management
关键词 临床路径 腹股沟疝 日间手术 腹腔镜 Clinical Pathway Inguinal Hernia Ambulatory Surgery Laparoscope
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献75

  • 1王玥,徐铭军.日间手术麻醉新进展[J].中国误诊学杂志,2009,9(1):16-17. 被引量:16
  • 2中华医学会外科学分会疝和腹壁外科学组.成人腹股沟疝、股疝和腹部手术切口疝手术治疗方案(2003年修订稿)[J].中华外科杂志,2004,42(14):834-835. 被引量:630
  • 3陈杰,那冬鸣,申英末,李杰,易秉强,樊华.局部神经阻滞麻醉在腹股沟无张力疝修补术中的应用[J].中华普通外科杂志,2005,20(2):107-108. 被引量:188
  • 4安燚,王振军.日间手术的概念和基本问题[J].中国实用外科杂志,2007,27(1):38-40. 被引量:240
  • 5De Bleser L, Dep reitere R, De Waele K. Defining pathways. Nurs M, 2006, 14(7): 553-563.
  • 6Topal B, Peeter G, Verbert A, et al. Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy: clinical pathway implementation is efficient and cost effective and increase hospital bed capacity. Surg Endose, 2007, 21: 1142-1146.
  • 7Cheah TS. The impact of clinical guidelines and clinical pathways on medical practice: effectiveness and medico-legal aspects. Ann Acad Med Singapore, 1998, 27(4): 533-539.
  • 8Pearson SD, Goulart-Fisher D, Lee TH. Critical pathways as a strategy for improving care: problems and potential. Ann Intern Med, 1995, 123(12): 941-948.
  • 9Holoweiko M. What are your greatest malpractice risks? Med Econ, 1992, 69(15):140-4, 146-8, 151 passim.
  • 10Schuld J, Richter S, Folz J. Influence of IT-supported clinical pathways on patient satisfaction at a surgical department of a university hospital. Dtsch Med Wochenschr, 2008, 133: 1235-1239.

共引文献239

同被引文献89

引证文献6

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部