行爲保全在知識産權際平行訴訟中的適用——兼評華爲與康文森行爲保全案

Application of Behaviour Preservation in International IP Parallel Litigation——Comments on Huawei v.Conversant

引言在華爲技術有限公司、華爲終端有限公司、華爲軟件技術有限公司與康文森無綫許可有限公司(下稱“康文森公司”)確認不侵害專利權及標準必妾專利許可糾紛三案中,經華爲技術有限公司申請,最高人民法院(下稱“最高法院”)於2020年8月28日作出行爲保全裁定(下稱“華爲案裁定”或者“華爲案”),責令康文森公司不得在該院就所涉案件作出終審判决前,申請執行德國杜塞爾多夫地區法院於2020年8月27日作出的停止侵權的一審判决。

Introduction In the disputes over declarations of non-infringement and standard-essential patent(SEP)licensing between Huawei Tech no logies Co.,Ltd.,Huawei Device Co.,Ltd.,Huawei Software Technologies Co.,Ltd.mnd Conversant Wireless Licensing S.a.r.l.(hereinafter referred to as"Conversant"),the Supreme People's Court(hereinafter referred to as"the Supreme Court")issued the Behaviour Preservation Ruling(hereinatter referred to as"the Ruling in the Huawei case"or"Huawei case")on 28 August 2020 upon the applicatio n of Huawei Tech no logies Co.,Ltd.,ordering Conversant not to apply for enforcing the First-Instance Judgment for cessation of infringement issued by the District Court of Dusseldorf,Germany,on 27 August 2020 prior to the Supreme Court5 s final judgments for the Chinese cases.