期刊文献+

单孔腹腔镜下完全腹膜外修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝的效果 被引量:2

Effect of single port laparoscopic total extraperitoneal repair on adult patients with inguinal hernia
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的分析单孔腹腔镜下完全腹膜外修补术(TEP)治疗成人腹股沟疝的临床效果。方法将2018年4月至2019年4月灵宝市第一人民医院收治的82例腹股沟疝患者的临床资料按照交替分组法分为两组,每组41例。对照组接受常规腹腔镜下腹膜外修补术,观察组接受单孔腹腔镜下完全腹膜外修补术治疗。观察两组围术期指标、术后并发症发生情况,随访1年后复发情况。结果两组住院时间比较差异未见统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组VAS评分及术中出血量均低于对照组,而手术时间短于对照组(P均<0.05)。与对照组(19.51%,8/41)比较,观察组术后并发症总发生率(4.88%,2/41)较低(P<0.05)。两组复发率比较差异未见统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论单孔腹腔镜下TEP应用于成人腹股沟疝患者的治疗中能够有效缩短患者恢复时间,降低术后并发症及复发率,安全有效。 Objective To analyze the clinical value of single port laparoscopic total extraperitoneal repair(TEP)on adult patients with inguinal hernia.Methods Eighty-two patients with inguinal hernia admitted to the First People’s Hospital of Lingbao from April 2018 to April 2019 were selected and divided into two groups according to the alternate grouping method,with 41 cases in each group.The control group received conventional laparoscopic extraperitoneal repair,and the observation group received single port laparoscopic total extraperitoneal repair.The perioperative indexes and postoperative complications of the two groups were observed,and the recurrence rate was followed up for1 year.Results There was no significant difference in hospitalization time between the two groups(P>0.05);the VAS score and intraoperative blood loss of the observation group were lower than those of the control group,while the operation time was shorter than that of the control group(all P<0.05).Compared with the control group(19.51%,8/41),the total incidence of postoperative complications in the observation group(4.88%,2/41)was lower(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in recurrence rate between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusions Single port laparoscopic TEP in the treatment of adult inguinal hernia patients can effectively shorten the recovery time,reduce postoperative complications and recurrence rate,which is safe and effective.
作者 南兵 Nan Bing(Department of General Surgery,the First People’s Hospital of Lingbao,Lingbao 472500,China)
出处 《临床医学》 CAS 2021年第3期21-23,共3页 Clinical Medicine
关键词 腹股沟疝 单孔 腹腔镜 腹膜外修补术 Inguinal hernia Single port Laparoscopy Extraperitoneal repair
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献106

  • 1李健文,郑民华.腹腔镜治疗腹股沟疝的合理选择[J].中国实用外科杂志,2006,26(11):824-826. 被引量:120
  • 2Memon MA, Cooper NJ, Memon B, et al. Meta-analysis of random- ized clinical trials comparing open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair[J]. Br J Surg, 2003,90(12):1479-1492.
  • 3Krishna A, Misra MC, Boansal VK, et al. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) versus totally extraperitoneal (TEP) approach: a prospective randomized con- trolledtrial[J]. Surg Endose, 2012,26(3 ):639-649.
  • 4Miserez M, Peeters E, Aufenaeker T, et al. Update with level 1 stud- ies of the European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of in- guinal hernia in adult patients[J]. Hernia, 2014,28(2):151-163.
  • 5Hallen M, Bergenfelz A, Westerdahl J. Laparoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair versus open mesh repair: long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial[J]. Surgery, 143 (3) :313-317.
  • 6Eklund AS, Montgomery AK, Rasmussen IC, et al. Low recurrence rate after laparoscopic (TEP) and open (Lichtenstein) inguinal her- nia repair a randomized, multicenter trial with 5-year follow-up[J]. Ann Surg, 249( 1 ):33-38.
  • 7Eklund A, Montgomery A, Bergkvist L, et al. Chronic pain 5 years after randomized comparison of laparoscopic and Lichtenstein in- guinal hernia repair[J]. Br J Surg, 2010,97(4):600-608.
  • 8Langevcld HR, van't Riet M, Weidema WF, et ah Total extraperi- toneal inguinal hernia repair compared with lichtenstein (the LEV- EL-Trial)a randomized controlled trial[J]. 2010,251 (5):819-824.
  • 9Heikkinen TJ, Haukipuro K, Koivukangas P, et al. A prospective randomized outcome and cost comparison of totally extraperitoneal endoscopic hernioplasty versus Liehtenstein hernia operation among employed patients[J]. Surg Laparoseopy, 1998,8(5):338-344.
  • 10Heikkinen T, Bringman S, Ohtonen P, et al. Five-year outcome of laparoseopic and Lichtenstein hernioplasties [J]. Surg Endosc, 2004,18(3):518-522.

共引文献185

同被引文献21

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部