期刊文献+

基于课程思政的军事英语“一体两翼式”教学模式研究 被引量:3

Research on the“One Body and Two Wings”Teaching Model of Military English Based on Curriculum Ideological and Political Education
下载PDF
导出
摘要 军事英语教学是军队院校培养精通军事、擅长指挥、懂得外语的复合新型军事人才的重要途径。根据军事英语教学的内容和目标,结合《高等学校课程思政建设指导纲要》的要求,尝试提出基于课程思政的“一体两翼式”教学模式,将英语语言知识、军事技能培养和思想政治教育相融合。在实际教学中实现了四个提升,即提升学员的爱国主义情怀以及作为军人的使命感和责任感、提升学员的跨文化交流能力、提升学员的军事知识和技能、提升教员的教学研究热情。 Military English teaching is an important way for military academies to train new compound military talents who are proficient in military science,good at command and can master foreign languages.Based on the content and objectives of military English teaching,the article attempts to propose a“one body and two wings”teaching model to apply ideological and political education in military English course,which integrates language knowledge,military skills training and ideological and political education.In the teaching practice,the following effects such as enhancing students’patriotism and their sense of mission and responsibility as serviceman,enhancing students’cross-cultural communication ability,enhancing students’military knowledge and skills,and enhancing teachers’enthusiasm for teaching and research have been achieved.
作者 陈琛 周芬芬 胡一南 Chen Chen;Zhou Fenfen;Hu Yinan(Foreign Language Teaching Section of Basic Course Department,Air Force Early Warning Academy,Wuhan 430019,China)
出处 《继续教育研究》 2021年第4期143-147,共5页 Continuing Education Research
关键词 课程思政 “一体两翼式” 军事英语 Applying ideological and political education in specialized courses “One body and two wings” Military English
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献37

  • 1王策三.论教师的主导作用和学生的主体地位[J].北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),1983(6):70-76. 被引量:141
  • 2黄月圆,顾曰国.以学生为中心,多维一体的大学英语教学法[J].外语教学与研究,1996,28(2):9-13. 被引量:103
  • 3杨忠.培养技能 发展智能——外语教育工具性与人文性的统一[J].外语学刊,2007(6):133-137. 被引量:95
  • 4Larsen-Freeman, D. 2005. Teaching Language: From Grammar to Grammaring [M~. Bos- ton, MA:. Thomson Heinle.
  • 5Collins, J. & N. O'Brien (eds.). 2003. Greenwood Dictionary of Education ~-Z~. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
  • 6Hanten, G., X. Li, S. Chapman, P. Swank, J. Gamino, G. Roberson&H. Levin. 2007. De- velopment of verbal selective learning [J]. Developmental Neuropsychology 32 (1). 585-596.
  • 7Kirschner, P., J. Sweller & R. Clark. 2006. Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, expe- riential, and inquiry-based teaching [J]. Educational Psychologist 4(2) : 75-86.
  • 8Krashen, S. 1985. The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications I-M3. London: Longman.
  • 9Long, M. 1983. Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of com- prehensible input [J]. Applied Linguistics 4:126-141.
  • 10Long, M. 1996. The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition I-A3. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (eds.). Handbook of Second Language Acquisition [C3. SanDiego: Academic Press. 413-468.

同被引文献15

引证文献3

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部