期刊文献+

基于FOCUS-PDCA程序的护理管理模式在重型颅脑损伤患者中的应用 被引量:12

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析基于发现-组织-澄清-理解-选择-计划-实施-检查-处理程序护理管理(FOCUS-PDCA)程序的护理管理模式在重型颅脑损伤患者中的应用效果.方法以本院2018年2月至2019年8月收治的90例重型颅脑损伤患者为对象,按电脑数字表法随机分为两组,对照组45例予以常规护理管理,观察组45例予以基于FOCUS-PDCA程序的护理管理模式,比较两组的并发症发生情况、生存质量及满意度.结果观察组并发症发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组颅脑损伤患者生活质量量表(QOLIBRI)中的人际关系、总体感觉、独立性、思考能力、情绪及自我评价维度评分比对照组高,而脑损伤困扰程度、消极感觉、身体限制与状况维度评分比对照组低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组患者满意度为93.33%,比对照组的77.78%高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论基于FOCUS-PDCA程序的护理管理模式在重型颅脑损伤患者中的应用效果显著,有助于防止并发症,提升患者生存质量及满意度. Objective To analyze the effect of nursing management model based on FOCUS-PDCA program in patients with severe traumatic brain injury.Methods 90 cases of patients with severe traumatic brain injury treated in our hospital from February 2018 to August 2019 were selected as the objects,and they were divided into two groups according to computer digital meter methods,45 cases in the control group were received routine nursing management,45 cases in the experimental group were given nursing management mode based on FOCUS-PDCA program.The occurrence of complications,quality of life and sarisfaction of the parients were compared between the two groups.Results After nursing,the incidence of complications in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group,with statistically significant(P<0.05).The scores of interpersonal relationship,overall feeling,independence,thinking ability,emotion and self-evaluation in the QOLIBRI table of the experimental group were higher than those of the control group,while the brain injury distress,negative sensation,physical lintitarion and condition dimensions scores were lower than those in the control group,with statistically significant(P<0.05).The satisfaction rate of patients in the experimental group was 93.33%,which was higher than 77.78%in the control group,with statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion The application of nursing management mode based on FOCUS-PDCA program in patients with severe traumatic brain injury has significant effects,can help to prevent complications,as well as improve the quality of life and sarisfaction.
出处 《浙江临床医学》 2021年第4期575-577,共3页 Zhejiang Clinical Medical Journal
关键词 FOCUS-PDCA程序 护理管理 重型颅脑损伤 并发症 生存质量 满意度 FOCUS-PDCA program Nursing management Severe traumatic brain injury Complication Quality of life Satisfaction
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献42

  • 1吴渭虹,陈欣怡,刘思文,郑玲.住院病人需求调查与分析[J].护理管理杂志,2004,4(11):14-17. 被引量:34
  • 2朱士俊.医院管理学·质量管理分册[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2003..
  • 3Carey RG, Seibert JH. A patient survey system to measure quality improvement: questionnaire reliability and validity [ J ]. Medical Care,1993,31 (9) :834 -845.
  • 4Von Steinbtichel N, Wilson L, Gibbons H, et al. Quality of life after brain injury ( QOLIBRI): scale validity and correlates of quality of life.J Neurotrauma, 2010,27:1157-1165.
  • 5TruelleJL, Von Steinbuchel N, Wild KV, et al. The QOLIBRI to-wards a quality of life tool after traumatic brain injury current develop-ment in Asia. Acta Neurochir Wien,2008,101 :125-129.
  • 6Hawthorne G, Kaye AH, Gruen R, et al. Traumatic brain injury and quality of life: initial Australian validation of the QOLIBRI.J Clin Neurosci, 2011 ,18: 197 -202.
  • 7Nell V, Yates DW ,Kruger. An extended Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS-E) with enhanced sensitivity to mild brain injury. Arch Phys Med Reha-bil, 2000, 81 :614-617.
  • 8Nichol AD, Higgins AM, Gabbe BJ, et al. Measuring functional and quality of life outcomes following major head injury: common scales and checklists. Injury, 2011 ,42 :281-287.
  • 9Green RE, Colella B, Hebert DA, et al. Prediction of return to pro- ductivity after severe traumatic brain injury: investigations of optimal neuropsychological tests and timing of assessment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2008,89: S51-S60.
  • 10CorriganJD, Selassie A W , OrmanJA. The epidemiology of traumatic brain injury.J Head Trauma Rehabil, 2010,25 :72-80.

共引文献282

同被引文献158

引证文献12

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部