文化领导权视角下的文化安全

On Cultural Security:at the Perspective of Cultural Leadership

葛兰西的文化领导权理论诞生后在西方得到广泛研究。法兰克福学派等对其进行了理论演进;西方社会主义政党放弃文化领导权,西方的合作社运动和英国费边社的渗透策略等对其进行了实践印证,从而充实并拓展了文化领导权的内涵和外延。文化安全肇因于文化领导权导致的文化“势差”,西方是文化方面的强势方,掌握着文化领导权(文化霸权),并对弱势的社会主义国家和发展中国家进行渗透,以达到控制这些非西方国家的目的。面对西方的文化渗透,非西方国家不应陷入“过度安全化”“恶意安全化”的陷阱,而应在意识形态领域采取积极防御政策的同时,在非意识形态领域坚持有原则的开放,从而积极参与国际竞争。由此,应在独立自主的基础上,博采众长、为我所用,从而通过吸收人类一切优秀成果促进自身创新,促进本国文化茁壮成长。

After Gramsci's theory of cultural leadership was born,it hasbeen widely studied in the West.In theoretic layer,Frankfurt school andothers have carried on the theoretical evolution to it;In practical layer,thewestern socialist political party abandoned the cultural leadership,the West-ern cooperative movement,and the British Fabian Society's entrenchmentstrategy are proofs to show cultural leadership's rightness.Together,theyenriched and expanded the cultural leadership's content.The West's culturalhegemony is the cause of the cultural security issue.Cultural security is dueto the cultural"“power gap”caused by cultural hegemony.The West is pow-erful in culture field.It controls cultural leadership,i.c.cultural hegemony,infiltrating vulnerable socialist and developing countries,in order to controlthese non-western countries.Encountering the West's cultural penetration,non-western countries should not fall into the traps of“excessive security”and“malicious security”,but take active defense policies in the ideologicalfield and adhere to openness with principles in the non-ideological field,so asto actively participate in international competition.Therefore,basis on inde-pendence,we should learn from others’advantages and use them for our-selves,to promote our own innovation and the vigorous growth of our ownculture by absorbing all the excellent achievements of mankind.