期刊文献+

大学生主观幸福感和社会幸福感实证研究 被引量:1

An Empirical Research on the Subjective Well-Being and Social Well-Being of College Students
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对浙江某高校1100名“00后”大学生进行调查,利用SPSS统计分析软件对主观幸福感、社会幸福感及其影响因素进行了分析。研究发现:主观幸福感中积极维度表现较好,而消极维度中的个别变量反映出心理问题;社会幸福感各个变量中,家庭关系和社会人际关系影响突出;个人因素整体对主观幸福感未体现出显著影响,但其中身体健康对主观幸福感影响显著;个人因素通过社会幸福感对主观幸福感产生影响。高校需从4个方面来提升“00后”大学生的幸福感:关注大学生身体健康,加强高校体育教育和管理;依据学生的背景档案,进行大学生管理和心理健康引导;加强大学生的社交教育,适当增加学生的压力;重视大学生的隐形心理压力,提升学生对校园生活的兴趣度。 A survey is carried out among 1100 post-00s students in a university in Zhejiang Province and their subjective well-being and social well-being and influencing factors are analyzed by SPSS statistical analysis software.The study finds that the positive dimensions of subjective well-being perform better while several variables of negative dimensions reflect psychological problems;that among all valuables of social well-being,family relationships and interpersonal relationships exert obvious influence;that personal factors as a whole do not have significant impact on subjective well-being but physical health among them does;that personal factors have an impact on subjective well-being through social well-being.Therefore,universities need to improve post-00s students well-being on the following four aspects:they should pay attention to their physical health and strengthen physical education and management,conduct student management and mental health guidance based on their background,strengthen their social education and properly add more pressure on them,and attach importance to the hidden psychological pressure of students and enhance their interest in school life.
作者 孙华军 黄富长 张志坚 Sun Huajun;Huang Fuchang;Zhang Zhijian(Jiaxing Nanhu University,Jiaxing,Zhejiang 314001;Business School,Shanghai Dianji University,Shanghai 201306)
出处 《嘉兴学院学报》 2021年第3期124-130,共7页 Journal of Jiaxing University
基金 2019年浙江省教育厅思政专项课题(Y201942416)。
关键词 大学生 主观幸福感 社会幸福感 college students subjective well-being social well-being
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献32

  • 1[1]Tucker L R, Lewis C. The reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1973, 38: 1~10
  • 2[2]Steiger J H, Lind J M. Statistically-based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the Psychometrika Society Meeting, IowaCity, May, 1980
  • 3[3]Bentler P M, Bonett D G. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 1980, 88: 588~ 606
  • 4[4]Bentler P M. Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin,1990, 107: 238~ 246
  • 5[5]McDonald R P, Marsh H W. Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness-of-fit. Psychological Bulletin, 1990,107: 247~ 255
  • 6[6]Marsh H W, Balla J R, Hau K T. An evaluation of incremental fit indices: A clarification of mathematical and empirical processes. In: Marcoulides G A, Schumacker R E eds. Advanced structural equation modeling techniques. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1996. 315~ 353
  • 7[7]Browne M W, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen K A, Long J S eds. Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1993. 136~ 162
  • 8[8]Joreskog K G, Srbom D. LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago: Scientific Software International, 1993
  • 9[9]Hu L, Bentler P M. Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 1998, 3: 424~ 453
  • 10[10]Hu L, Bentler P M. Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 1999, 6: 1~ 55

共引文献1856

同被引文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部