期刊文献+

学校课程治理:内涵、路径与保障 被引量:9

School Curriculum Governance:Connotation,Path and Guarantee
原文传递
导出
摘要 课程目标的有效达成是学校课程实施的根本目的。在学校课程实施过程中,不同课程利益主体有着自己的专业主张和教育诉求,这就需要学校通过课程治理的方式,以课程集体审议等形式来凝聚共识,在充分考虑不同课程利益主体专业主张和教育诉求的基础上,激发专业投入和资源投入的积极性,更有效、更有品质地执行课程标准和达成课程目标。为此,需要在课程治理过程中培育集体审议方式、丰富课程治理机会、规范课程治理过程,并以课程目标来建构教育集体活动。与此同时,还需要在组织建设、能力提升和制度设计上为学校治理的有效开展提供保障。 The effective achievement of curriculum objectives is the fundamental purpose of school curriculum implementation. In the process of school curriculum implementation, different curriculum stakeholders have their own professional propositions and educational demands, which requires schools to gather consensus through curriculum governance and curriculum collective deliberation. To stimulate the enthusiasm of professional investment and resource investment on the basis of fully considering the professional propositions and educational demands of different curriculum stakeholders, enables to implement curriculum standards and achieve curriculum objectives more effectively and qualitatively. Therefore, in the process of curriculum governance, we need to cultivate collective deliberation, enrich opportunities for curriculum governance, standardize the process of curriculum governance and construct educational collective activities based on curriculum objectives. Meanwhile, we also need schools to provide guarantee for the effective development of school governance in terms of organization construction, ability improvement and system design.
作者 周彬 ZHOU Bin(College of Teacher Education&the Instruction of Schooling Reform and Development,Faculty of Education,East China Normal University,Shanghai,200062,China)
出处 《全球教育展望》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第2期3-13,共11页 Global Education
基金 2016年度教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“学校治理现代化与政策保障”(项目编号:16JJK880020)的阶段性研究成果。
关键词 课程治理 课程改革 课堂教学 学校治理 curriculum governance curriculum reform classroom teaching school governance
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献15

  • 1Mundy J E What Does It Mean to Be Standardb-based? Issues in Conceptualizing, Measuring and Studying A- lignment with Standards [EB/OL]. http: //info. math. nankak edu, cn/mirror/www, notre, org/ highered/sirg/sirg3, pdf. (2010-03-20).
  • 2Hill H C. Policy Is not Enough.. Language and Interpretation of State Standards [J]. American Educa- tional Research Journal, 2001, 38 (2): 289--318.
  • 3Solomon P. The Curriculum Bridge: From Standards to Actual Classroom Practice [M]. Corwin Press, Inc. 2003.
  • 4English F W. Curriculum Mapping [J]. Educational Leadership. 1980, 2002 EB,SCO Publishing.
  • 5Pamela V, Heath P. Curriculum Mapping. Audi- ting the Taught Curriculum To Improve Student Achievement [M]. Virginia Department of Education Governor's Best Practice Center Region 6, 2002.
  • 6Porter A, Smithson J. Alignment of Assessments, Standards and Instruction: Using Curriculum Indicator Data [C]. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, April 1--5, 2002.
  • 7Blank R, Porter A, Smithson J. New Tools for Analyzing Teaching, Curriculum and Standards in Mathematics & Science [M]. Council of Chief Stats School Officers. 2001 : 9.
  • 8Leithwood K A, Montgomery. A Framework for Planned Educational Change: Application to the Assessment of Program Implementation [J]. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1982, 4 (2): 157--167.
  • 9Elliott J. The Systematic Production of Pedagogical Knowledge through Lesson and Learning Studies. the Next Task for WALS [C]. Papers Presented in the 2nd Annual Conference on Learning Study, 2009.
  • 10李子建 尹弘飚.教师对课程变革的认同感和关注.教育研究与发展,2005,1(1):107-128.

共引文献44

同被引文献121

引证文献9

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部