期刊文献+

腹腔镜无张力修补术与开放手术治疗原发性腹壁疝的疗效比较 被引量:2

Comparison of Effect of Laparoscopic Tension-free Repair and Open Surgery on Primary Abdominal Hernia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较腹腔镜无张力疝修补术与开放式疝修补术治疗原发性腹壁疝的临床疗效。方法:将某院2017年11月~2019年2月间治疗的70例原发性成人腹壁疝患者作为研究对象,采用数字双盲法将患者分为对照组和观察组各35例。对照组采用常规开放式疝修补术,观察组采用腹腔镜无张力疝修补术,比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间、术后24h疼痛评分及临床并发症,随访12个月复发率。结果:观察组手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间及术后24h VAS评分少于或低于对照组(P<0.05);观察组术后并发症发生率8.57%(3/35)明显低于对照组28.57%(10/35)(P<0.05);术后12个月,观察组复发2例,复发率为6.25%,对照组复发3例,复发率为8.57%;两组随访12个月复发率(观察组6.25%,对照组8.57%)比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:腹腔镜无张力疝修补术和开放式疝修补术均为腹壁疝的有效治疗手段,相较开放式疝修补术,腹腔镜无张力疝修补术在缩短手术时间,减少出血量,降低术后疼痛与并发症,促进术后康复方面的优势更为明显。 Objective:To compare the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic tension-free hernia repair and open hernia repair in the treatment of primary abdominal hernia.Methods:70 cases of primary adult abdominal hernia treated in a hospital from November 2017 to February 2019 were studied.The patients were divided into control group(35 cases)and observation group(35 cases)by digital double-blind method.The control group received conventional open hernia repair and the observation group received laparoscopic tension-free hernia repair.The operation time,intraoperative blood loss,length of stay,postoperative pain score after 24h and clinical complications were compared between the two groups,and the recurrence rate was followed up for 12 months.Results:The operative time,intraoperative blood loss,length of stay and VAS score 24h after operation in the observation group were less or lower than those in the control group(P<0.05).The incidence of postoperative complications in the observation group was 8.57%(3/35),significantly lower than that in the control group(28.57%,10/35,P<0.05).Twelve months after the operation,2 cases of recurrence occurred in the observation group,with a recurrence rate of 6.25%.3 cases of recurrence occurred in the control group,the recurrence rate was 8.57%,with no statistical significance(P>0.05).Conclusion:Both laparoscopic tension-free hernia repair and open hernia repair are effective treatment for abdominal wall hernia.Compared with open hernia repair,laparoscopic tension-free hernia repair has more advantages in shortening operation time,reducing bleeding volume,reducing postoperative pain and complications,and promoting postoperative rehabilitation.
作者 朱冠鹏 Zhu Guanpeng(Department of General Surgery,Wuqing District Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Tianjin 301700)
出处 《数理医药学杂志》 CAS 2021年第5期667-669,共3页 Journal of Mathematical Medicine
关键词 腹腔镜无张力修补术 开放式疝修补术 原发性腹壁疝 临床疗效 laparoscopic tension-free repair open hernia repair primary abdominal hernia clinical curative effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献73

  • 1郑民华,毛志海.腹壁切口疝的腹腔镜修补术[J].临床外科杂志,2005,13(2):119-121. 被引量:9
  • 2费阳,李基业.腹腔镜切口疝修补术的并发症及其处理[J].中华普通外科杂志,2006,21(2):159-160. 被引量:5
  • 3Sauerland S, Walgenbach M,Habermalz B,et al. Laparoscopicversus open surgical techniques for ventral or incisional herniarepair. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev,2011,16(3) :CD007781.
  • 4Kurmann A, Visth G,Candinas D, et al. Long-term follow-up of openand laparoscopic repair of large incisional hernias. World J Sui^,2011,35(2) :297-301.
  • 5Sajid MS, Bokhari SA,Mallick AS,et al. Laparoscopic versus openrepair of incisional/ventral hernia: a meta-analysis. Am J Surg,2009,197(1) :64-72.
  • 6Kocot A, Gerharz EW, Riedmiller H. Urological complications oflaparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a case series. Hernia,2011, 15(5):583-586.
  • 7Hamouda A, Kennedy J, Grant N,et al. Mesh erosion into the urinarybladder following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair; is this the tipof the iceberg.. Hernia,2010,14(3) :317-319.
  • 8CKand M,0n J,Bevan. K,et al. Mesh erosion following laparoscopicincisional hemia repair. Hernia,2012,16(2) :223-226.
  • 9Riaz AA, Ismail M,Barsam A,et al. Mesh erosion into the bladder:alate complication of incisional hemia repair. A case report and reviewof the literature. Hemia,2004 , 8(2) : 158-159.
  • 10Kurukahvecioglu 0, Ege B,Ya2icioglu 0,et al. Polytetrafluoroethyleneprosthesis migration into the bladder afterlaparoscopic hemia repair : acase report. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2007, 17 ( 5 ):474476.

共引文献86

同被引文献24

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部