期刊文献+

居伊·德波景观理论的视觉性批判——兼及当代视觉文化研究反思 被引量:2

Guy Debord’s Critique of Visual Culture and Reflection on Contemporary Visual Culture Study
下载PDF
导出
摘要 居伊·德波的景观理论蕴含着丰富的视觉性元素,从不同角度批判景观社会的视觉表演性、视觉密集性、视觉对倒性和视觉消费性,构成了视觉文化理论的重要组成部分。从视觉层面阐释景观理论,将景观批判话语纳入视觉文化理论谱系,无疑是近年来建构视觉文化理论体系的必要环节。不容忽视的是,景观理论存在一概而论的决裂性,导致景观的视觉话语方式缺乏严密的系统论证,也使其在真实和幻象之间失去价值重建的信心。然而,在批判理论和视觉文化的交汇点上,德波为研究当代具有批判意义的视觉文化提供了一个思想个案,在推动与发展当代视觉文化理论方面具有重要的理论参照意义。 Guy Debord’s spectacle theory includes rich visual elements. From different perspectives,he criticizes the spectacle performance,the spectacle density,the spectacle opposition and the spectacle consumption,which constitutes an important part of visual culture theory. It is necessary to integrate the critical discourse of spectacle into the genealogy of visual culture theory. What cannot be ignored is that there is a general weakness in spectacle theory,which leads to the lack of rigorous and systematic demonstration of visual discourse,and also makes it lose the confidence of value reconstruction. However,at the intersection of critical theory and visual culture,Debord not only provides critical discourse resources,but also plays an important role in developing contemporary visual culture study.
作者 余燕莉 YU Yanli(School of Chinese Language and Literature,South China Normal University,Guangzhou 510006,Guangdong,China)
出处 《惠州学院学报》 2021年第1期63-68,共6页 Journal of Huizhou University
关键词 居伊·德波 景观社会 视觉性 视觉文化 Guy Debord the society of the spectacle theory visuality visual culture
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献17

  • 1卡洛林·科斯麦耶.《味觉与趣味—食物与哲学》第1章[M].中国友谊出版公司,2001年版..
  • 2Martin Jay, Downcast Eyes. The Denigration of Vision in Twentieth-Century French Thought, Los Angeles . University of California Press, 1993, Chap. 1.
  • 3Martin Jay, Downcast Eyes. The Denigration of Vision in Twentieth-Century French Thought, Chap. 1.
  • 4Hans Jonas,"The Nobility of Sight" ,in Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 14-4 ( 1954 ), p. 507, p. 519.
  • 5Martin Jay, Downcast Eyes. The Denigration of Vision in Twentieth-Century French Thought, Chap. 1-2 .
  • 6J. Lacan, The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psycho-a-nalysis, London .Penguin Books, 1979, p. 73.
  • 7Guy Debord, The Society of Spectacle, New York. Zone Books,1995,p. 12 ,p. 17.
  • 8安妮·弗莱伯格 罗岗 顾铮主编.《移动和虚拟的现代性凝视.流浪汉/流浪女》[A].罗岗,顾铮主编.《视觉文化读本》[C].广西师范大学出版社,2003年版.第327-328页.
  • 9J. Baudrillard ,Simulacra and Simulation,Ann Arbor. The University of Michigan Press, 1994 ,p. 2 ,p. 6.
  • 10Mieke Bal, "Visual Essentialism and the Object of Visual Culture" ,Journal of Visual Culture, 2-1 (2003) , p.9.

同被引文献17

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部