期刊文献+

新疆地区局部晚期鼻咽癌Nomogram预后模型研究 被引量:1

A prognostic nomogram model for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Xinjiang region
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的分析新疆地区局部晚期鼻咽癌患者治疗后的预后相关因素,构建列线图(Nomogram)预后模型,并对此模型进行验证.方法选择2010年7月至2017年6月新疆医科大学附属肿瘤医院收治并行根治性调强放射治疗的鼻咽癌患者317例,使用最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)回归法进行单因素筛选后行Cox多因素回归分析,并构建Nomogram预后模型对局部晚期鼻咽癌患者预后进行评估.采用一致性指数(C-index)、校准曲线、净重分类改善指数(NRI)、综合判别改善指数(IDI)进行Nomogram与TNM分期系统之间模型的验证与评估.使用决策树算法对患者列线图风险进行分层,生存率采用Kaplan-Meier法计算,并采用Log-rank法检验.结果T分期、N分期、乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)、转移性淋巴结体积(GTVnd)及初治血浆EBV-DNA拷贝量(EBV-DNA)与总生存(OS)相关,将各因素纳入Nomogram预后模型,C-index为0.784(95%CI:0.736~0.831,P<0.01).校准曲线显示,由Nomogram模型预测的OS概率与实际观察到的OS有较好的一致性,结果在验证队列中获得了验证;且在使用净重分类改善指数及综合判别改善指数对OS的准确性进行评估时Nomogram模型结果均优于美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)第8版分期系统所建模型.使用决策树算法根据Nomogram得分可将患者分为4个不同危险程度的亚组,组间生存率差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=113.21,P<0.01),高风险队列内的患者能从诱导化疗联合同步放化疗中获得总生存获益.结论本课题组建立的Nomogram模型可为本地区局部晚期鼻咽癌患者临床诊疗及预后评估提供参考意见. Objective To analyze the prognostic factors of patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma after treatment,to develop and validate the prognostic Nomogram model.Methods From July 2010 to June 2017,317 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma who were treated with definitive intensity modulated radiation therapy were selected.The regression method of least absolute shrinkage and selection operator(LASSO)was used for univariate screening,and Cox multivariate regression analysis was performed.The prognostic Nomogram model was constructed for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients.C-index,calibration curve,Net Reclassification Index(NRI),integrated discrimination improvement(IDI)were used to validate and evaluate the model between Nomogram and TNM staging system.The risk evaluated through nomogram was stratified by decision tree algorithm,and the survival rate was calculated by Kaplan-Meier method and compared by Log-rank test.Results T stage,N stage,LDH,GTVnd and pre-treated plasma EBV-DNA copy(EBV-DNA)were correlated with total survival(OS).All the above factors were included in prognostic Nomogram model,and C-index was 0.784(95%CI:0.736-0.831,P<0.01).The calibration curve showed that the OS probability predicted by Nomogram model was in good agreement with the actual OS,and the result were verified in the validation cohort.Furthermore,the accuracy of the Nomogram model for OS predicting was superior to AJCC 8th version staging system judged by NRI and IDI.According to the Nomogram score,patients can be divided into four subgroups with different risk by decision tree algorithm.K-M survival curve showed that the difference of OS between different groups was statistically significant(χ^(2)=113.21,P<0.01),and patients in high-risk group can benefit from induction chemotherapy combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy in survival.Conclusions The Nomogram model established by our research group can provide information on diagnosis,treatment and prognosis evaluation for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients in this area.
作者 赵敏 刘凯 王若峥 Zhao Min;Liu Kai;Wang Ruozheng(Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University(Third Clinical Medical College),Key Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Radiotherapy,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences,Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Oncology,Urumqi 830011,China)
出处 《中华放射医学与防护杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2021年第4期259-264,共6页 Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection
基金 新疆维吾尔自治区科技支疆项目(2020E0265)。
关键词 鼻咽癌 列线图 EB病毒 预后 Nasopharyngeal carcinoma Nomogram Epstein-Barr virus Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献46

  • 1曹卡加,李茵,谢国丰,洪明晃.儿童与青少年鼻咽癌的预后因素分析[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2006,28(2):134-137. 被引量:9
  • 2Fleming ID,Cooper JS,Henson DE,et al. AJCC cancer staging manual[M].5th ed. Philadelphia,PA:Lippincott-Raven,1997.
  • 3Sobin LH,Wittekind CH.TNM classification of malignant tumours[M].5th ed. New York,NY:Wiley-Liss,1997.
  • 4Ho JHC.Stage classification of nasopharyngeal carcinoma:a review[A]//de Teh G,Ito Y.Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma:Etiology and Control[M].Lyon,France:International Agency for Research on Cancer,1978:99-113.
  • 5Lee AWM,Foo W,Law SCK,et al. Staging of nasopharyngeal carcinoma:from Ho’s to the new UICC system[J].Int J Cancer,1999,84(2):179-187.DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19990420)84:2<179::AID-IJC15>3.0.CO;2-6.
  • 6Greene F,Page D,Fleming I.AJCC cancer staging manual[M].6th ed. New York,NY:Springer-Verlag,2002.
  • 7Sobin LH,Wittekind C.TNM classification of malignant tumours[M].6th ed. New York,NY:Wiley-Liss,2002.
  • 8Sobin LH,Gospodarowicz MK,Wittekind C.TNM classification of malignant tumours[M].7th ed. Oxford,United Kingdom:Wiley-Blackwell,2009.
  • 9Edge S,Byrd DR,Compton CC,et al. AJCC cancer staging handbook:from the AJCC cancer staging manual[M].7th ed. New York,NY:Springer,2010.
  • 10Lee AWM,Au JSK,Teo PML,et al. Staging of nasopharyngeal carcinoma:suggestions for improving the current UICC/AJCC staging system[J].Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol),2004,16(4):269-276.DOI:10.1016/j.clon.2004.01.008.

共引文献80

同被引文献10

引证文献1

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部