摘要
我国值班律师最大的争议点在于其是否具有辩护人地位。根据现行法律规定,值班律师履行的是法律帮助职权,而非辩护职权。但是这并不妨碍其具有阅卷权,阅卷权并非辩护人独享。为了保障无辩护人的被追诉人的知情权以及认罪认罚从宽制度的顺利运行,值班律师具有阅卷的必要性。阅卷应当成为值班律师可选择适用的权利。完善值班律师的阅卷权,应当进一步明确其阅卷的时间起点、丰富其具体方式、界定其案卷范围并完善其便利条件。
The most controversial point of duty lawyer in our country is whether he has the status of defender.According to the legislation and the purpose of the system,duty lawyers perform legal aid function,not the defense function.However,it doesn’t mean that they don’t have the right to read files.The right to read files is not exclusive to defenders.In order to protect the defendants’right to access to files,and make the system of leniency on admission of guilt and acceptance of punishment work smoothly,duty lawyers should be granted the right of reading files.And this right should be optional for duty lawyers.To improve duty lawyers’right of reading files,our country should explicit its starting time,increase its ways,define its scope and improve its facilitating conditions.
作者
林艺芳
Lin Yifang(Law School,Xiangtan University,Xiangtan,Hunan 411105)
出处
《河南财经政法大学学报》
CSSCI
2021年第3期132-140,共9页
Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law
基金
2016年湖南省教育厅科学研究优秀青年项目“刑事被追诉人的阅卷权研究”(项目编号16B261)的阶段性成果。
关键词
值班律师
阅卷权
辩护人
法律帮助
认罪认罚从宽制度
duty lawyers
right to read files
defense lawyers
legal aid
Chinese plea bargaining