期刊文献+

破“五唯”背景下高校学术评价的理性思考与改革路向 被引量:24

Rational Thinking and Reform Direction of Academic Evaluation in Colleges and universities under the background of breaking“Five only”
下载PDF
导出
摘要 “唯论文、唯帽子、唯职称、唯学历、唯奖项”的“五唯”现象成为高校学术评价的顽瘴痼疾。破“五唯”,关键是要破除“唯”的至上性、绝对性和极端性,而不是抛弃论文等。要理解“五唯”产生的制度根源,加强政策的整体系、系统性设计,做到“破”“立”结合,缩短政策“真空期”,从制度和文化着手进行标本兼治。政府进一步简政放权,优化学术评价制度环境;推动高校学术生产模式转换;建设学术共同体,完善同行评议制度;强化分类评价导向,构建符合学科特点的多元评价体系;发展第三方科技评价机构,积极开展第三方评估。 The phenomenon of“Five-Only”:“paper-only”,“hat-only”,“title-only”,“academic qualifications-only”and“awards-only”has become a persistent and chronic problem of academic evaluation in colleges and universities.To break the“Five-Only”,we should break the supremacy,absoluteness and extremity of“Only”,rather than abandoning paper,etc.It is necessary to understand the institutional root of“Five-Only”,strengthen the overall system and systematic design of policies,achieve the combination of“breaking”and“establishing”,shorten the“vacuum period”of policies,and tackle both symptoms and root causes from the perspective of system and culture.The government further streamlined administration and delegated power,and optimized the academic evaluation system environment.Promote the transformation of academic production mode in universities;Build academic community and perfect peer review system;Strengthen the classification evaluation orientation,and construct the multiple evaluation system in line with the characteristics of the subject;We will develop third-party science and technology evaluation institutions and actively carry out third-party evaluation.
作者 肖国芳 彭术连 XIAO Guo-fang;PENG Shu-lian(Research Office of Development and Reform,Shanghai Jiao Tong University,Shanghai 200240,China;School of Design,Shanghai Jiao Tong University,Shanghai 200240,China)
出处 《科学管理研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第2期65-72,共8页 Scientific Management Research
基金 国家社会科学基金全国教育科学“十三五”规划一般课题(BIA170204)。
关键词 “五唯” 学术评价 多元评价 学术共同体 第三方评估 “Five only” academic evaluation the multiple evaluation academic community third party evaluation
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献57

共引文献270

同被引文献230

引证文献24

二级引证文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部