期刊文献+

水力冲洗应用于排水小管径倒虹吸管的效果与优化 被引量:2

Performance and Parameters Optimization of Hydraulic Flushing in Small Diameter Inverted Siphon
原文传递
导出
摘要 为了延长污水管道的使用寿命、减少管道冲洗成本、降低人工养护风险、提高污水管网管理水平,设计了一种水力冲洗小管径倒虹吸管道的方法,并研究了倒虹吸管段流速与污泥沉淀量的关系、蓄水冲洗前后倒虹吸管段流速的变化、拦蓄水量与倒虹吸管段冲洗效果的关系、冲洗频率与倒虹吸管段沉淀量的关系。结果表明,随着流速的增大,污泥沉淀量出现逐渐降低的趋势;随着拦蓄盾拦蓄水位的升高,倒虹吸管段的流速也逐渐增大,超过55 cm时,流速上升趋势变缓;当拦蓄水位在50~55 cm之间时,倒虹吸管段污泥浓度的去除率明显升高,最优拦蓄水位为55 cm;设备的最优冲洗频率为3次/d;自冲洗设备对管道中的漂浮物和悬浮物具有非常好的去除效果。 In order to extend service life of sewage pipelines,reduce pipeline flushing costs and the risk of manual maintenance,and improve the management level of sewage pipelines,a method for hydraulic flushing of small diameter inverted siphon was designed,and relationship between flow velocity of the inverted siphon pipeline and content of sludge sedimentation,variations in flow velocity of the inverted siphon pipeline before and after water storage and flushing,relationship between water storage and flushing performance of the inverted siphon pipeline,and relationship between flushing frequency and sedimentation content of the inverted siphon were explored.With the increase of flow velocity,the amount of sludge sedimentation tended to be a gradual decreasing trend.As the water storage capacity of the intercepting shield increased,the flow velocity of the inverted siphon pipeline gradually increased.When the water level exceeded 55 cm,the flow velocity increased slowly.When the interception water level was between 50 cm and 55 cm,the removal efficiency of sludge concentration in the inverted siphon pipeline increased obviously.Therefore,the optimal water level was 55 cm,and the optimal flushing frequency of the device was 3 times/day.Self-flushing equipment had a very good removal performance on floating and suspended matters in the pipeline.
作者 姜明洁 夏业 JIANG Ming-jie;XIA Ye(No.4 Network Operation Company,Beijing Drainage Group Co.Ltd.,Beijing 100032,China;Beijing BEIPAI Smart Water Co.Ltd.,Beijing 100032,China)
出处 《中国给水排水》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2021年第7期92-95,共4页 China Water & Wastewater
关键词 污水管道 管道养护 自冲洗 水力冲洗 倒虹吸 sewage pipeline pipeline maintenance self-flushing hydraulic flushing inverted siphon
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献23

  • 1李茂英,李海燕.城市排水管道中沉积物及其污染研究进展[J].给水排水,2008,34(S1):88-92. 被引量:28
  • 2刘翠云,车伍,董朝阳.分流制雨水与合流制溢流水质的比较[J].给水排水,2007,33(4):51-55. 被引量:38
  • 3国家环境保护总局《水和废水监测分析方法》编委会.水和废水监测分析方法[M](第四版)[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2002.254-257.
  • 4GB 50014-2006,室外排水设计规范[S].
  • 5Chapman P M. Sediment Quality Triad approach. In: Sediment Classification Methods Compendium[ R]. EPA-823-R-92-006.
  • 6Christine-Mertz M C, Chebbo G, Saad M. Origins and characteristics of urban wet weather pollution in combined sewer systems: The experimental urban Catchment " Le Marais" inParis[J]. Water Science and Technology, 1998, 37 (1): 35- 43.
  • 7Bertrand-Krajewski J L, Bardin J P, Gibello C. Long term monitoring of sewer sediment accumulation and flushing experiments in a man-entry sewer [ J ]. Water Science & Technology, 2006, 54 (6-7) : 109-117.
  • 8Gromaire M C, Garnaud S, Saad M, et al. Contribution of different sources to the pollution of wet weather flows in combined sewers[J]. Water Research, 2001, 35(2): 521-533.
  • 9Krejci V, Dauber L, Novak B, et al. Contribution of different sources to pollutant loads in combined sewers [ A ]. In: Proceeding of the 4th international conference on urban storm drainage[ C]. Lausanne, Swizerland, 1987.34-39.
  • 10Ahyerre M, Chebbo G, Saad M. Sources and erosion of organic solids in a combined sewer[ J]. Urban Water, 2001, 2 (4): 305-315.

共引文献15

同被引文献8

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部