期刊文献+

应用激光跟踪仪的三坐标测量机几何误差检测方法 被引量:9

Measurement Method of Geometric Error of Coordinate Measuring Machine Using Laser Tracer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 几何误差是三坐标测量机的重要误差来源,三坐标测量机几何误差检测方法存在效率低、测量精度不高的问题,严重影响三坐标测量机使用性能的进一步提升。为此,提出了一种应用激光跟踪仪的三坐标测量机几何误差检测与直接分离方法。首先,基于多体系统理论和齐次坐标变换方法,建立三坐标测量机几何误差模型;其次,建立激光跟踪仪测量几何误差的数学模型,以三坐标测量机几何误差特性为约束条件,结合Levenberg-Marquardt方法,实现了几何误差的直接分离。最终,应用该方法在某三坐标测量上进行了几何误差检测试验,并使用激光干涉仪进行了单项定位误差和空间位置误差的检测对比。试验结果表明:该三坐标测量机X、Y和Z轴定位误差分别为-27.06、43.75和36.76μm,X、Y轴垂直度误差为-82.89μrad,是其主要误差来源;预测最大空间误差为74.64μm,位于测量空间的极限区域。辨识结果与激光干涉仪检测结果相比,X、Y和Z轴定位误差最大相差7.43μm,体对角线预测定位误差最大相差10.51μm;与其他跟踪测量方法相比,X和Y轴空间位置误差与激光干涉仪检测结果相差最小为5.3μm,验证了该方法的有效性。该方法可在2 h内实现三坐标测量机17项几何误差的检测,具有快速和高精度的优点,在三坐标测量机和数控机床精度检测领域有较大的应用前景。 Geometric error is an important error source of coordinate measuring machine(CMM).The geometric error measurement methods currently used have the problems of low efficiency and low accuracy,which seriously deteriorate the further improvement of the performance of CMM.Hence,a novel geometric error measurement and direct separation method of CMM using laser tracer was proposed.Firstly,the geometric error model was established based on the multi-body system theorem and homogeneous coordinate transformations.Furthermore,the mathematical model of geometric error measurement using laser tracer was formulated.And the geometric errors were directly separated based on the constraints of geometric error characteristics combining with the Levenberg-Marquardt method.Finally,the experiment of geometric error measurement of a CMM using a laser tracer and comparison experiments of single axis positioning error and volumetric positioning error were carried out.The results showed that the positioning errors of X,Y and Z axis are-27.06,43.75 and 36.76μm,respectively,and the squareness error between X and Y axis was-82.89μrad,which were the main error sources.The maximum volumetric error predicted of CMM was 74.64μm,which was located in the limit area of the measurement volume.The identification results of geometric errors compared with the results measured by laser interferometer showed that,the maximum difference of three-axis positioning errors was 7.43μm and the maximum difference of body diagonal positioning errors predicted was 10.51μm.Compared with other laser tracking geometric error measurement method,X and Y axis volumetric positioning errors measured by this proposed method were the closest to the results measured by laser interferometer with the maximum difference of5.3μm which verified the effectiveness of this method.In addition,the 17 geometric errors of CMM could be measured within 2 hours by the method,which is of high speed and accuracy,and has a large application in the field of accuracy measurement of CMM and CNC machine tool.
作者 韩林 米良 刘兴宝 滕强 唐强 夏仰球 HAN Lin;MI Liang;LIU Xingbao;TENG Qiang;TANG Qiang;XIA Yangqiu(Inst.of Machinery Manufacturing Technol.,China Academy of Eng.Physics,Mianyang 621900,China;National Machine Tool Production Quality Supervision Testing Center(Sichuan),Chengdu 610200,China;Inst.of Launch Dynamics,Nanjing Univ.of Sci.and Technol.,Nanjing 210094,China)
出处 《工程科学与技术》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2021年第3期159-165,共7页 Advanced Engineering Sciences
基金 国防科工局技术基础科研项目(J0067-1922-FJC) 四川省重大科技专项项目(2020ZDZX0003) 中国工程物理研究院创新发展基金培育项目(K1253-2020-TCF)。
关键词 几何误差 激光跟踪仪 约束条件 空间位置误差 geometric error laser tracer constraints volumetric positioning error
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献59

  • 1闫勇刚,欧阳健飞,杨红果,夏飞.激光跟踪仪校准技术及在机床检测中的应用[J].红外与激光工程,2008,37(S1):158-161. 被引量:11
  • 2沈兴全,张清.三坐标数控机床精度检测与误差补偿[J].测试技术学报,2005,19(3):264-268. 被引量:26
  • 3[1]ISO 230-1:1996.Test Code for Machine Tools-Part 1:Geometric Accuracy of Machines Operating Under No-Load or Finishing Conditions[S].1996.
  • 4[2]Knapp W.Measurement uncertainty and machine tool testing[J].Annals of the CIRP,2002,51 (1) :459-462.
  • 5[3]Evans C J,Hocken R J,Estler W T.Self- calibration:reversal,redundancy,error separation and "absolute testing"[J].Annals of the ClRP,1996,45 (2):617-634.
  • 6[4]Squires B A,Knapp W.Circular tests on large machines [A].In:Proceedings of Higher Precision of Machine Toolsthe European Approach,13th-14th Nov 2000 [C].Graz,Austria,2000.
  • 7[5]ISO 230-4:2005.Test Code for Machine Tools-Part 4:Circular Tests for Numerically Controlled Machine Tools [S].2005.
  • 8[6]ISO 230-6:2002,Test Code for Machine Tools-Part 6:Determination of Positioning Accuracy on Body and Face Diagonals (Diagonal Displacement Tests) [S].2002.
  • 9[7]PTB.Guideline for the DKD-calibration of test plates in the form of ball-plate and bore plate[Z].Braunschweig:1992.
  • 10[8]Kunzmann H,Trapet E,Waildele F.Results of the international comparison of ball plate measurements in CIRP and WECC[J].Annals of the CIRP,1995,44(1) :479-482.

共引文献131

同被引文献83

引证文献9

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部