期刊文献+

腹部手术加速康复外科患者疼痛控制结局的研究 被引量:1

Research on the outcome of pain control in patients undergoing accelerated rehabilitation after abdominal surgery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究腹部手术加速康复外科患者疼痛控制结局,为改进腹部手术患者疼痛控制结局提供参考。方法选取2018年1月至2019年5月采用便利抽样法对符合入选标准的228例腹部手术加速康复外科患者在术后24~48 h进行疼痛控制结局问卷调查,描述疼痛控制结局,比较使用与未使用非药物止痛措施患者的疼痛控制结局指标的差异,并分析影响疼痛控制满意度的因素。结果腹部手术加速康复外科患者术后24 h内:最高疼痛评分中位数为4.00(3.00)分,处于重度疼痛的百分比中位数为20.00(20.00)%,疼痛对下床活动的影响评分中位数为3.00(3.00)分,疼痛缓解程度中位数为70.00(20.00)%,疼痛控制满意度中位数为8.00(2.00)分;使用非药物止痛措施的患者“术后24 h最高疼痛评分”和“处于重度疼痛的百分比”低于未使用非药物止痛措施的患者,“疼痛控制满意度”高于未使用非药物止痛措施的患者,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);疼痛控制满意度与术后疼痛缓解程度(r=0.657)、参与疼痛治疗决策程度(r=0.673)、疼痛治疗方案信息的帮助程度(r=0.460)显著相关,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);与获得疼痛治疗方案信息(r=0.156)、使用非药物止痛措施(r=0.183)、医护人员鼓励非药物止痛措施频率(r=0.173)显著相关,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论腹部手术加速康复外科患者疼痛控制结局总体较好,仍需关注术后活动性疼痛的评估和治疗,重视使用非药物镇痛措施,以期改善患者的疼痛控制结局;患者对术后疼痛控制的总体评价满意,值得临床借鉴。 Objective To research the outcome of pain control in patients undergoing accelerated rehabilitation after abdominal surgery,and to provide reference for improving the outcome of pain control in patients undergoing abdominal surgery.Methods A questionnaire survey from January 2018 to May 2019 was conducted on the outcome of pain control in 228 patients who met the inclusion criteria of accelerated rehabilitation surgery during 24-48 hours after abdominal surgery according to the convenient sampling method.Meanwhile,the outcome of pain control was described,the difference of outcome of pain control between patients who used and did not use non-drug analgesic measures were compared and the factors impacting the satisfaction of pain control were analyzed.Results Within 24 hours after surgery,in the patients who underwent accelerated rehabilitation surgery after abdominal surgery,the median score of the highest pain was 4.00(3.00)points,the median percentage of severe pain was 20.00(20.00)%,the median score of the impact of pain on getting out of bed was 3.00(3.00)points,the median degree of pain relief was 70.00(20.00)%,and the median satisfaction with pain control was 8.00(2.00)points.The“highest pain score”and“percentage of severe pain”of patients who took non-drug analgesic measures were lower than those who did not take non-drug analgesic measures,and the“pain control satisfaction”was higher than that of patients who did not take non-drug analgesic measures,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Satisfaction with pain control was significantly correlated with postoperative pain relief degree(r=0.657),participation in pain treatment decision-making degree(r=0.673)and assistance degree of pain treatment plan information(r=0.460),and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).It was significantly correlated with obtaining information of pain treatment plan(r=0.156),using non-drug analgesic measures(r=0.183),and the frequency of encouraging non-drug analgesic measures by medical staff(r=0.173),and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion The outcome of pain control in patients undergoing accelerated rehabilitation surgery after abdominal surgery is generally good,and it is still necessary to pay attention to the evaluation and treatment of postoperative active pain and pay attention to the use of non-drug analgesia measures,so as to improve the outcome of pain control of patients.Patients are satisfied with the overall evaluation of postoperative pain control,which is worthy of clinical reference.
作者 付丽萍 张军港 冯霞 裘丹英 FU Liping;ZHANG Jungang;FENG Xia;QIU Danying(PACU,Zhejiang Provincial People′s Hospital,the People′s Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College,Hangzhou310014,China;Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery,Zhejiang Provincial People′s Hospital,the People′s Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College,Hangzhou310014,China;Department of Nursing,Zhejiang Provincial People′s Hospital,the People′s Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College,Hangzhou310014,China)
出处 《中国现代医生》 2021年第11期170-175,共6页 China Modern Doctor
基金 浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目(2016KYB023)。
关键词 疼痛控制 加速康复外科 腹部手术 非药物镇痛措施 Pain control Accelerate rehabilitation surgery Abdominal surgery Non-drug analgesia measures
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献102

  • 1高英丽,朱京慈.颅脑损伤后应激性溃疡的发病机制及预防[J].中华创伤杂志,2005,21(6):478-479. 被引量:65
  • 2徐迎春,万学英,王庆华.术后疼痛评估及镇痛护理进展[J].国际护理学杂志,2006,25(5):329-332. 被引量:158
  • 3钟天安,王建奇,姚鹏飞,徐越,贾军,张浚.重型颅脑损伤后应激性溃疡防治与胃肠道感染的相关性及对策[J].中华神经医学杂志,2006,5(8):823-825. 被引量:36
  • 4赵继军.疼痛护理学[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2003:298.
  • 5江志伟,黎介寿,汪志明,李宁,柳欣欣,李伟彦,朱四海,刁艳青,佴永军,黄小静.胃癌患者应用加速康复外科治疗的安全性及有效性研究[J].中华外科杂志,2007,45(19):1314-1317. 被引量:242
  • 6Tycross R,Harcourt J,Bergl S.A survey of pain in patients with advanced cancer[J].Pain Symptom Manage,1996,12(5):273-282.
  • 7Leila Niemi-Murola,Reino Poybia,Birthe Rben,et al.Patient satisfaction with postoperative pain management-effect of preop-erative factors[J].Pain Management Nursing,2007,8(3):122-129.
  • 8Cleeland CS,Gonin R,Hatfield AK,et al.Pain and its treatment in outpatients with metastatic cancer[J].N Engl J Med,1994,330(9):592-596.
  • 9StootJH, van Dam RM, Busch OR, et al. The effect of a multi?modal fast-track programme on outcomes in laparoscopic liver sur?gery: a multi centre pilot study[J]. HPB (Oxford) ,2009 , 11 (2) : 140-144. DOl: 10. 11111j.1477-2574. 2009. 00025. x.
  • 10Couma DJ, van Geenen RCI, van Gulik TM, et al. Rates of com?plications and death after pancreaticoduodenectomy , Risk factors and the impact of hospital volume[J]. Ann Surg, 2000 ,232 ( 6) : 786-794.

共引文献508

同被引文献21

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部