期刊文献+

论“排除合理怀疑”标准之确立及实践

On the Establishment and Practice of the Standard of"Beyond Reasonable Doubt"
下载PDF
导出
摘要 “排除合理怀疑”这一证明标准伴随着陪审团制度的发展而逐步确立,同时受到宗教道德神学、近代哲学认识论以及庭审模式变革等众多因素的影响。尽管该证明标准在普通法系国家已经有很长的历史,但对其是否应进行解释以及如何解释一直存有争论。我国于2012年将该标准写入刑事诉讼法,为了保证其在我国刑事司法实践的正确适用,避免冤假错案的发生,提高司法的公信力,应采取提供指导案例、提升法官职业素质、提高证人的出庭率等措施,以保证“排除合理怀疑”的证明标准在我国行稳致远。 The standard of proof"beyond reasonable doubt"was gradually established along with the development of the jury system,which was influenced by many factors such as religious moral theology modern philosophical epistemology,and the reform of trial mode.Although the standard of proof has a long history in common law countries,there are always debates on whether and how to interpret it.In 2012,this standard was written into the Criminal Procedure Law in China.In order to ensure its correct application in China's criminal judicial practice,avoid the occurrence of miscarriages of justice,and improve the judicial credibility,we should publish guiding cases,improve the professional quality of judges,improve the attendance rate of witnesses and other measures to ensure that the standard of proof"beyond reasonable doubt"will be stable and sustainable in our country.
作者 王金良 WANG Jin-liang(School of Law,Shandong University,Qingdao Shandong 266237,China)
机构地区 山东大学法学院
出处 《齐齐哈尔大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2021年第5期98-101,共4页 Journal of Qiqihar University(Philosophy & Social Science Edition)
关键词 排除合理怀疑 标准的确立 适用 exclude reasonable doubt establishment of the standard applicable
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献66

  • 1See John Wilder May, Some Rules of Evidence :Reasonable Doubt in Civil and Criminal Cases,lO Am. L. Rev. 642,657 -58 (1876).
  • 2L. Kinvin Wroth, Hiller B. Zobel,Legal Papers of John Adams,Volume 3. Cases 63 & 64:The Boston Massacre Trials Chronolgy. Index, Cambridge, MA : The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, p. 271 ( 1965 ).
  • 3John La-rgent,OBSP (Apr. 1783, #314), pp. 491,499 (theft from the mails), http://www, oldbaileyonline, org/browse, jsp? id = tl7830430 - 67 - defend847&div = t17830430 - 67&terms = ifl on I viewing I the I evidence I any I reasonable I doubt#highlight.
  • 4See also Barbara Sha- piro, Changing Language, Unchanging Standard: From "Satisfied Cortscience" to "Moral Certainty" and" Beyond Reasonable Doubt", 17 Cardozo J. Int' 1 & Comp. L. 2009, pp. 261,276.
  • 5Also see John H. Langbein, The Origins of Adversary Criminal Trial, Oxford : Oxford University Press, p. 263 (2003).
  • 6James Q. Whitman, The Origins of Reasonable Doubt:Theological Roots of the Criminal Trial, New Haven:Yale University Press, p. 193 (2008). The Proceedings of the Old Bailey Ref:T17831210 -4.
  • 7Quoted in James Q. Whitman, The Origins of Reasonable Doubt:Theological Roots of the Criminal Trial, New Haven : Yale University Press, pp. 197 - 98 ( 2008 ).
  • 8Richard Corbett,OBSP (July. 1783 ,670) ,at 879,895 (arson) ,Richard Corbett,OBSP (July. 1783 ,#670) ,at 879,895 (arson). ht- tp ://www. oldbaileyonline, org/browse, jsp? id = t17840707 - 10 - personl61 &div = t17840707 - 10&terms = there I is I a I reasonable [ doubt#high- light. 2013/2/3.
  • 9Joseph Rickards,OBSP ( Feb. 1786 ,#192) ,at 298,309 (murder). http://www, oldbaileyonline, org/browse, jsp? id = t17860222 - 1 - peon52&div = t17860222 - 1 #highlight.
  • 10State v. Cochran,13 N.C.56,57-58,2 Dev. 63,64-65 (1828).

共引文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部