摘要
明末徐鸿儒及白莲教活动作为重要历史事件,在文本中展现出差异性书写。《聊斋志异》借助民间素材,通过文学性笔法和叙事结构设计,在《小二》《白莲教》(卷四)《白莲教》(卷六)《邢子仪》篇中,塑造出徐鸿儒及相关人物的全新形象。并在民间评判基础上,构建新的历史立场,提出“左道正用”的独特叙事逻辑,以市井民众的丰富视角、多重叙事线索对该题材加以多层次书写。在构筑徐鸿儒事件的民间记忆基础上,反映出作家文学与民间文学的互动关系。
The textual depiction of Xu Hongru and activities of the White Lotus Cult at the end of the Ming Dynasty, as important historic events, demonstrates difference in writing. With the help of folk materials, Liaozhai Zhiyi creates a new image of Xu Hongru and related characters in Xiao Er, White Lotus Cult (Volume 4), White Lotus Cult (Volume 6), and Xing Ziyi through literary writing and narrative structure design. On the basis of folk judgment, it constructs a new historical stance, proposes a unique narrative logic that "heretical measures can be used for the right purpose", and writes on the subject at multiple levels from various perspectives of the people in the city and multiple narrative clues. On the basis of constructing folk memory of the Xu Hongru Incident, it reflects the interactive relationship between writer’s literature and folk literature.
出处
《济南大学学报(社会科学版)》
CSSCI
2021年第3期38-46,158,共10页
Journal of University of Jinan:Social Science Edition