期刊文献+

基于ICNSS评分的分层护理在急性心肌梗死合并心力衰竭患者中的应用效果分析 被引量:8

Stratified nursing based on ICNSS score in patients with acute myocardial infarction and heart failure:an analysis of the application effect
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨基于重症监护护理评分系统(ICNSS)的分层护理在急性心肌梗死合并心力衰竭患者中的应用效果。方法选取2019年12月至2020年5月我院心脏重症监护室(CCU)收治的急性心肌梗死合并心力衰竭患者66例为研究对象,根据患者入院顺序分为对照组和观察组,每组33例。对照组患者给予CCU常规护理干预,观察组患者在常规护理的基础上给予基于ICNSS评分的分层护理干预。比较两组患者的护理质量;比较两组患者住CCU治疗时间;比较两组患者护理干预前后的抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分、焦虑自评量表(SAS)评分,并发症的发生情况以及患者家属对护理服务的满意度。结果观察组患者的基础护理、病区管理、心理护理、专业护理、护理态度、急救护理评分均显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组患者住CCU治疗时间显著短于对照组(P<0.05)。护理干预前,两组患者的SDS、SAS评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);护理干预后,两组患者的SDS、SAS评分均显著降低,观察组患者的SDS、SAS评分显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。住CCU期间,观察组患者并发症总发生率(6.1%)显著低于对照组(24.2%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组患者家属对护理服务的满意度(93.9%)显著高于对照组(75.8%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论将基于ICNSS评分的分层护理应用于急性心肌梗死合并心力衰竭患者,可提高护理质量,减少患者并发症的发生,缩短患者住CCU治疗时间,提高患者家属对护理服务的满意度。
作者 郑玲 邢永生 郝宗娇 ZHENG Ling;XING Yongsheng;HAO Zongjiao
出处 《内科》 2021年第2期270-273,共4页 Internal Medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献161

  • 1Roffi M, Patrono C, Collet JP, et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: Task Force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) [J]. Eur Heart J, 2016, 37 (3) : 267-315. DOI: 10. 1016/j. rec. 2015. 10. 009.
  • 2Nabi F, Chang SM, Xu J, et al. Assessing risk in acute chest pain : The value of stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients admitted through the emergency department [ J]. J Nucl Cardiol, 2012, 19 (2): 233-243. DOI: 10. 1007/s12350-011-9484-7.
  • 3Shah BN, Balaji G, Alhajiri A, et al. Incremental diagnostic and prognostic value of contemporary stress echocardiography in a chest pain unit: mortality and morbidity outcomes from a real-world setting [J]. Cardiovasc Imaging, 2013, 6 (2): 202-209. DOI: 10. ll61/CIRCIMAGING. 112. 980797.
  • 4Huhen E, Pickett C, Bittencourt MS, et al. Outcomes after coronary computed tomography angiography in theemergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials [J]. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2013, 61 (8): 880- 892. DOI: 10. 1016/j. jacc. 2009. 02. 008.
  • 5Mueller C, Giannitsis E, Christ M, et al. Multicenter evaluation of a 0-hour/l-hour algorithm in the diagnosis ofmyocardial infarction with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T [ J ]. Ann Emerg Med, 2016, pii: S0196-0644 (15) 01501-2. DOI: 10. 1016/j. annemergrned. 2015. 11. 013.
  • 6Reichlin T, Schindler C, Drexler B, et al. One-hour rule-out and rule-in of acute myocardial infarction using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T [J]. Arch Intern Med, 2012, 172 (16) : 1211-1218. DOI: 10. 1001/archintemmed. 2012. 3698.
  • 7Steg PG, James SK, Atar D, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation [J]. Eur Heart J, 2012, 33 (20) : 2569-2619. DOI: 10. 1093/eurheartj/ehs215.
  • 8Fox KA, Fitzgerald G, Puymirat E, et al. Should patients with acute coronary disease be stratified for management according to their risk Derivation, external validation and outcomes using the updated GRACE risk score [J]. BMJ Open, 2014, 4 (2): e4425. DOI: 10. 1136/bmjopen-2013-O04425.
  • 9Abu-Assi E, Raposeiras-Roubin S, Iear P, et al. Comparing the predictive validity of three contemporary bleeding risk scores in acute coronary syndrome [J]. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care, 2012, 1 (3): 222-231. DOI: 10. 1177/2048872612453924.
  • 10Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A, et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes [ J ]. N Engl J Med, 2009, 361 (11): 1045-1057. DOI: 10. 1056/ NEJMoa0904327.

共引文献920

同被引文献113

引证文献8

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部