摘要
建设"主导性和主体性相统一"的思政课是"八个统一"的明确要求,但在高校思政课教学实践中教师主导性强而学生主动性弱的矛盾却突出存在。建构主义学习理论为解决这一难题提供了行动指南。以建构主义学习理论为指导的"四维协同"思政课互动式教学模式通过打造"协作备课空间""线上学习空间""线下学习空间"和"反馈提升空间",运用交互式教学方法实现师与师在课前以及师与生、生与生在课前、课中、课后全时空的信息交流与活动交往,促进教学同构、师生协同,为建设"主导性和主体性相统一"的思政课提供了参考模型。
The construction of ideological and political course with "unity of dominance and subjectivity" is the explicit requirement of "eight unifications". However, in the teaching practice of ideological and political course in colleges and universities, the contradiction between teachers’ strong dominance and students’ weak initiative is prominent. Therefore, it is urgent to solve the contradiction between teachers’ dominance and students’ subjectivity through teaching design under the guidance of scientific theory. Constructivism learning theory provides an action guide to solve this problem. Guided by constructivism learning theory, the "four-dimensional collaboration" interactive teaching mode of ideological and political course uses modern intelligent teaching platform to create "collaborative lesson preparation space", "online learning space", "offline learning space" and "feedback promotion space" of ideological and political course teaching, and uses interactive teaching method to realize the information exchange and activity communication between teachers and students in the above "four-dimensional space" before, during and after class. The "four-dimensional collaboration" interactive teaching mode can promote the isomorphism of teaching and the cooperation between teachers and students, and provide a reference model for the construction of "the unity of dominance and subjectivity" of ideological and political course.
作者
于瑶
YU Yao(School of Marxism,Shandong Youth University of Political Science,Jinan 250103,China)
出处
《山东青年政治学院学报》
2021年第3期13-18,共6页
Journal of Shandong Youth University of Political Science
基金
山东青年政治学院教学改革重点项目“基于‘智慧树’平台的高校思政课‘四维融合’互动式教学模式研究——以思想道德修养与法律基础课为例”(JGXM202029)。
关键词
“四维协同”
建构主义
互动
主导性
主体性
four dimensional collaboration
constructivism
interaction
dominance
subjectivity