期刊文献+

Influence of soil density on gas permeability and water retention in soils amended with in-house produced biochar 被引量:1

下载PDF
导出
摘要 Biochar has been used as an environment-friendly enhancer to improve the hydraulic properties(e.g.suction and water retention)of soil.However,variations in densities alter the properties of the soil ebiochar mix.Such density variations are observed in agriculture(loosely compacted)and engineering(densely compacted)applications.The influence of biochar amendment on gas permeability of soil has been barely investigated,especially for soil with different densities.The major objective of this study is to investigate the water retention capacity,and gas permeability of biochar-amended soil(BAS)with different biochar contents under varying degree of compaction(DOC)conditions.In-house produced novel biochar was mixed with the soil at different amendment rates(i.e.biochar contents of 0%,5%and 10%).All BAS samples were compacted at three DOCs(65%,80%and 95%)in polyvinyl chloride(PVC)tubes.Each soil column was subjected to dryingewetting cycles,during which soil suction,water content,and gas permeability were measured.A simplified theoretical framework for estimating the void ratio of BAS was proposed.The experimental results reveal that the addition of biochar significantly decreased gas permeability kg as compared with that of bare soil(BS).However,the addition of 5%biochar is found to be optimum in decreasing kg with an increase of DOC(i.e.k_(g,65%)>k_(g,80%)>k_(g,95%))at a relatively low suction range(<200 kPa)because both biochar and compaction treatment reduce the connected pores.
出处 《Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering》 SCIE CSCD 2021年第3期593-602,共10页 岩石力学与岩土工程学报(英文版)
基金 The authors would like to acknowledge the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Grant No.41907252) Shantou University Scientific Research Fund(Grant No.NTF17007)
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献150

  • 1Hill, M.P. &amp; T. Olckers. 2001. Biological control initiatives against water hyacinth in South Africa: constraining factors, success and new courses of action. In: Julien, M.H., T.D. Hill &amp;J.Q. Ding eds. Biological and integrated control of water h
  • 2Holms, L.G., D.L. Plucknett, J.V. Pancho &amp; J.P. Herbiger.1977. The world' s worst weeds: distribution and biology. 18th edn. Honolulu: Hawaii University Press. 609.
  • 3Howard, G.W. &amp; K. L.S. Harley. 1998. How do floating aquatic weeds affect wetland conservation and development? How can these effects be minimised? Wetlands Ecology and Management,5:215-225.
  • 4Howard-Williams, C. &amp; J.J. Gaudet. 1985. The structure and functioning of African swamps. In: Denny, P. ed. The ecology and management of African wetland vegetation. Dordrecht: Dr W. Junk Publishers. 153~ 175.
  • 5Howard-Williams, C. &amp; K. Thompson. 1985. The conservation and management of African wetlands. In: Denny, P. ed. The ecology and management of African wetland vegetation. Dordrecht:Dr W. Junk Pubhshers. 203 ~ 230.
  • 6Hutchinson, G.E. 1975. A treatise on limnology. Vol. Ⅲ. In:Edmonson, Y.H. ed. Limnological botany. New York: John Wiley &amp; Sons Incorporated. 231.
  • 7Imaoka, T. &amp; S. Teranishi. 1988. Rates of nutrient uptake and growth or the water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes Mart.Solms.). Water Resource, 22:943-951.
  • 8Indra, R. &amp; K.V. Krishnamurthy. 1984. Allelopathic control of water hyacinth. In: Thiagarajan, G. ed. Proceedings of the international conference on water hyacinth. Hyderabad, India: United Nations Environment Programme. 936 ~ 943.
  • 9International Organization for Biological Control / International Mycoherbicide Programme for Eichhornia crassipes Control in Africa (IOBC/IMPECCA). 2001. Newsletter. Montpelier: IOBC Publisher. 22 - 25.
  • 10Irving, N.S. &amp; M.O. Beshir. 1982. Introduction of some natural enemies of water hyacinth to the White Nile, Sudan. Tropical Pest Management, 28: 20- 26.

共引文献66

同被引文献7

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部